CHAPTER 5
SYNOVIUM AND CARTILAGE IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- SECTION ONE: NORMAL ANATOMY OF SYNOVIUM
SECTION TWO: TRAUMA AND THE HEALING PROCESS OF SYNOVIUM" SECTION THREE: THE ARTICULAR CARTILAGES" SECTION FOUR: THE RESPONSE OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE TO MECHANICAL INJURY
SECTION ONE
NORMAL ANATOMY OF SYNOVIUM
H. RALPH SCHUMACHER JR.
Gross Appearance
Light Microscopy
Electron Microscopy
Many descriptions of normal synovial membrane have been published.(11) Most studies have been performed in a variety of small animals and show generally consistent findings among species. Detailed reports include guinea pig,(32) monkey,(23) rat,(30) rabbit,(8,16) pig,(22) cat,(18) chick,(13) frog,(15) and dog synovium.(2,26) This section of the chapter is a summary of the various reports; included are those instances in which rare, possibly unique, findings have been suggested for certain animals. The references at the end of the chapter usually identify in which animals the studies were done. There are definite differences in the appearance of synovium in different synovial joints and even in different parts of the same joints of individual animals.(5) Although these differences have been the subject of little study, they need to be considered in evaluating pathologic processes in the synovium.
GROSS APPEARANCE
The synovial surface (when viewed by arthroscopy or at surgery without a tourniquet) appears pale pink, smooth, and shiny with a moistening of synovial fluid. Folds are seen at some places, such as at the insertion of the periosteum into the subchondral bone, but villi are seen only microscopically.Measurable volumes of synovial fluid cannot be aspirated from truly normal joints of small animals. The few drops obtainable are viscous and clear. Few cells, almost all of which are mononuclear, are present. (See Chapter 86.)
LIGHT MICROSCOPY
The innermost structures of synovium consist of one to three layers of cells generally identified as synovial lining cells (SLC). The number of these cells varies in different parts of the joint(3) and may also appear to vary when the cells are cut tangentially. Normal lining cells are oval or slightly flatter with their long axes parallel to the surface of the synovium. Lining cells are closely spaced but are not continuous. Small processes are present but are generally best appreciated on epon-embedded rather than paraffin sections. Mitotic figures are rare, although studies with Feulgen cytophotometry suggest that lining cells can divide.(12)No specific feature separates the lining cells from the deeper structures, to which there are various modes of transition. In fibrous synovial membrane, lining cells tend to be few and to lie directly on dense fibrous tissue. In areolar or fatty synovial membrane, more small vessels are appreciated immediately under the SLC and in connective tissue septae extending between fat cells. The surface of areolar synovium tends to be more undulating, while on fibrous areas of synovium the surface is flatter. In fibrous synovium, fibrocytes with elliptic nuclei are seen along with the collagen and occasional elastic fibers.(3) Alcian blue also stains for profuse glycosaminoglycan in the matrix.(3)
Very superficial capillaries and small venules are often seen but may be inconspicuous unless dilated. Lumens can collapse and do so when flow is temporarily shunted away, as normally occurs. Arterioles and larger venules are seen deeper in the synovium. Even in some normal joints there can be thicker endothelium and vessel wall than might be expected merely by the size of the vessel lumen.(6)
Lymphatics are also present but are virtually never detected on routine studies of sections of normal tissue. Mast cells and a few macrophages are seen around vessels. The mast cells can be demonstrated only with special stains such as toluidine blue. They are infrequent in fibrous synovium. Nerves are scarce in the superficial synovium compared with the deep capsule. They can be identified with Gros-Bielschowsky stains(10) Their most commonly suggested role in superficial tissue is autonomic.
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
Scanning electron microscopy has aided in the characterization of the structure of the synovial surface. In the canine knee(33)areolar synovium can be confirmed to have an undulating or folded surface. Cytoplasmic processes of lining cells can be identified. In synovium overlying fat pads, a cobblestone appearance due to the fat cells can be seen on the surface. Fibrous synovium has a smoother surface with less evident cell processes.Transmission electron microscopy(25) shows SLC arranged loosely in a granular and fibrillar matrix (Fig. 5- 2 and 5-3). Tight junctions are not present between lining cells (rare desmosomes have been described in normal mice); hence, the matrix is exposed to the joint space at many places. The most superficial cells often have many thin cytoplasmic processes, prominent vacuoles, dense bodies, and Golgi apparatus. This type of cell has generally been termed a type A lining cell.(1) It is active in phagocytosis of particles such as ferritin, carbon, or proteins(28) that have been experimentally injected either intra-articularly or intravenously.(21,23)
Generally most prominent deep to any type A lining cell are cells with fewer filopodia, abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and fewer of the structures typical of a type A cell. These cells have been termed type B. They are probably involved mainly in synthesis for secretion, although they also can phagocytose. Cells with features of both types exist in virtually all animals studied and have been termed type C. Cells typical of type B tend to have more homogeneous nuclear chromatin.(5) It is generally suspected but not yet established that transitions occur between the various types and that cells may have different features in nearby sections of the same cell. All SLC have organelles common to most cells, including mitochondria, microtubules, moderate and occasionally clustered microfilaments measuring 80 A to 100 A in diameter, pinocytic vesicles, glycogen particles, centrioles, occasional lipid droplets, and occasional cilia. Mitotic figures are very rare.
A variety of substances(4) have been identified as products of SLC, as determined mostly from histochemical and tissue culture studies. These include hyaluronic acid, collagenase, collagen, proteases, "connective tissue-activating peptide," nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) diaphorase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, prostaglandins, plasminogen activator, and fibronectin.(27)Whether type A, B, or C cells are the origin of most of these products is not fully resolved. Hydrolytic enzymes appear to arise in large part from type A cells and are not seen in deeper synovial fibroblasts.(11) Definite type B lining cells are negative for peroxidase and for IgG or C3 receptors, which appears to separate them from monocytes,(l7,31) although there is recent evidence that monocytes are the origin of some of the type A lining cells.
FIG. 5-4 Electron micrograph shows fenestrated endothelium (E) of superficial vessel at higher magnification. (RBC, erythrocyte in the lumen) (original magnification x 30,000)
FIG. 5-6 Electron micrograph shows synovial mast cell with typical granules and long cytoplasmic processes (arrows). (original magnification x 17,000) Dense secretory vesicles associated with the Golgi apparatus of type B lining cells have been described as prominent in mouse and rat synovium but not in synovium of other animals. (19) Small amounts of basement membrane-like material can occasionally be seen adjacent to SLC, but there is no organized basement membrane separating the SLC from the deeper structures.
Matrix around the lining cells and deeper in the synovium consists of finely granular material, thin filaments of 90 A to 200 A diameter, and thicker mature collagen with typical 640-A banding.(20) Ruthenium red has been used to stain matrix proteoglycans and produces dark staining on the synovial surface, throughout the matrix, and on the surface of collagen fibers(14) It has been suggested that the matrix contributes some minor restriction to the transport of solutes,(29) but electrolytes, for example, are present in comparable levels in synovial fluid and serum. Larger particles such as carbon black also migrate readily from vessels through the matrix of rabbit synovium after intravenous injection.(24)
Some capillaries can be seen immediately beneath the SLC. Many of these most superficial vessels have fenestrated endothelial cells,(23,30) with the fenestrations tending, at least in the rat,(30) to be most prominent on the side of the vessel nearest the joint space. Fenestrations in capillaries and venules have a small diaphragm that appears to allow rapid passage of solutes (Fig. 5-4). Similar vessels are also seen in the renal glomerulus, choroid plexus, and intestinal villi, where there is prominent transport of fluid across the vessels. Electrolytes and low-molecular-weight proteins such as albumin seem to pass readily from vessels into the joint space. Thus it is suspected that these fenestrated vessels contribute most of the fluid for formation of the synovial fluid and that the lining cells add the hyaluronase protein.
Deeper capillaries and venules have dramatically thicker endothelium without fenestrations (Fig. 5-5). This endothelium is rich in organelles including mitochondria, dense bodies (lysosomes), vesicles, filaments,microtubules, rough endoplasmic reticulum, multivesicular bodies, and rodlike WeibelPalade bodies that are seen typically in endothelium. Intercellular junctions can open to allow escape of circulating particles, neutrophils during inflammation, or experimentally injected particles such as carbon black.(23) Even normal endothelium has prominent flaps and processes extending into the lumen and can phagocytize circulating particles. Both thick- and thin-walled vessels are surrounded by a single layer of basement membrane. Similar basement membrane also envelops pericytes of the larger vessels.
Arterioles are seen less commonly and are identified by their elastic and muscular walls.
Rare Iymphatics can be identified by the absence of intraluminal erythrocytes and by thin endothelium often closely approximated to the surrounding collagen.
Unmyelinated nerves can occasionally be seen in superficial synovium and are usually adjacent to small vessels. In the fibrous capsule, myelinated nerves and Ruffini corpuscles can be seen. (9)> Mast cells (Fig. 5-6) are also seen in the perivascular area and have characteristic laminated material in their granules. Fat cells and fibrocytes with surrounding collagen are seen in varying proportions in the various areas of synovium. Collagen in the synovial stroma is identified as predominantly types I and III. (7)
A few deep macrophages are seen even in normal synovium and may contain granular or other material in vacuoles. Unexplained crystalline arrays of 20 nm to 25 nm tubules have been seen in some normal dog synovial cells as well as in diseased tissue (Fig. 5-7).(26)
SECTION TWO
TRAUMA AND THE HEALING PROCESS OF SYNOVIUM
H. RALPH SCHUMACHER JR
Responses to Experimental Blunt Trauma Acute and Chronic Human Traumatic Arthritis Synovial Regeneration After Surgical or Chemical Synovectomy Synovial Healing After Incision
RESPONSES TO EXPERIMENTAL BLUNT TRAUMA
A recent study (69)examined the sequential effects of blunt external trauma on the synovial membrane of dogs in an attempt to elucidate the process involved in the clear or hemorrhagic joint effusions that have been said to occur after moderate trauma not associated with fracture.(56,62) Anesthetized mongrel dogs weighing 15 kg to 26 kg were studied after metal weights of 245 g to 564 g were repetitively dropped from a height of 25 cm onto the lateral aspect of the right knee over a period of 1 to 4 days.Carbon black was injected intravenously 10 minutes prior to the last trauma in order to better study extravasation. Joints were aspirated and dogs sacrificed 30 to 100 minutes after the last trauma. Synovial fluid volume was increased in the traumatized knees. Fluids of eight dogs were clear yellow and two were bloody. There were few nucleated cells, virtually all of which were synovial lining cells (SLC). Fat droplets stained with oil red O were found in all traumatized joints but not in controls.
Gross examination revealed small hematomas in the subcutaneous tissue at the site of trauma. The synovium appeared pink and more hyperemic than that in the control knees but was not grossly hemorrhagic. Lines of black discoloration from the carbon black were seen only in the traumatized knees. Dissection of the adjacent structures showed no fractures or ligamentous tears.
Light microscopy identified significantly more vascular congestion in the traumatized knees but no differences in lining cell proliferation between acutely traumatized and control joints. Neither fibrin nor inflammatory cell infiltrates were found.
Electron microscopy showed no detectable differences between control and traumatized synovium as far as types of lining cells or connective tissue morphology. Gaps between endothelial cells were identified in only one synovium (a traumatized one), while extravascular carbon black particles were prominent in three traumatized sides but no controls. The extravasated carbon was identified in venule walls (Fig. 5-8), pericytes, macrophages, and interstitially even in synovial tissue on the side of the joint away from the administered trauma. Fat droplets were seen in vessel walls, interstitium, and lining cells only in the traumatized knees. No bone or cartilage fragments nor calcium apatite crystals were found.
Thus, this blunt trauma produced what appeared to be largely functional changes with diffuse increased vascular permeability. A demonstrable inflammatory cell response was not elicited. The release of lipid, which apparently had its origin in the adipose synovium,(44,52) has the potential for causing an inflammatory response as shown in studies in other dogs.69 No follow-up studies have been performed to see if the transudation and lipid release produce any later morphologic changes.
ACUTE AND CHRONIC HUMAN TRAUMATIC ARTHRITIS
Humans experiencing similar acute trauma have occasionally been studied by needle synovial biopsies and have shown only vasodilation, edema, and slight focal increases in SLC.(64) Long-standing traumatic arthritis complicated by damage to cartilage and menisci shows more striking morphologic changes. Light microscopic findings include mild proliferation of SLC,(58,66) some Iymphocytic infiltration, and vascular sclerosis. Electron microscopy shows marked increases and some dilation of rough endoplasmic reticulum of synovial cells, an increase in dense bodies, and an increase in lipid droplets. The contributions of on-going trauma due to the cartilage damage and the healing process are impossible to separate in these clinical studies.
SYNOVIAL REGENERATION AFTER SURGICAL OR CHEMICAL SYNOVECTOMY
Studies of the healing process that occurs after subtotal surgical synovectomy have been performed in normal rabbits,(34,45,48) rabbits with experimental immune synovitis,(38) and in humans with rheumatoid arthritis.(49,51,53) The effects of chemical synovectomy of rabbit knees have also been examined.(36)In the studies on normal rabbits, surgical synovectomies were performed, wounds were closed and dressed, and the animals allowed activity as tolerated. Animals were sacrificed for study from 3 to 25 days in the various reports. Light microscopic studies have shown that synovial membrane with a typical lining layer regrows within approximately 30 to 60 days. During the first 3 days, fibrin and cell debris predominated. A few macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) were also seen. By the fourth day fibrocytes had aligned roughly with the surface.(34) At 25 and 50 days it was believed that these same cells had become surface lining cells. Regeneration specifically did not seem to come from residual lining cells at the margin of the excised synovium.(34) There was hyperemia below, and tissue was still more fibrous than normal. At 85 days synovium looked normal except for some scarred areas.
By electron microscopy, elongated cells with profuse rough endoplasmic reticulum and uniform chromatin in their nuclei, appearing to be fibroblasts, had largely lined the joint cavity.(43) A few phagocytic cells were seen throughout the tissue and seemed to congregate deep to the fibrocytes, where they were believed to form the type A lining cells. Both types of cells populating the joint surface had many nucleoli. Throughout the first 5 weeks cells on the surface gradually became less flattened, and cell processes extended toward the joint space at 35 days when they completely lined the tissue surface. Synovial vessels were not discussed in these reports.(48)
In joint disease due to experimental arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, synovium regenerated with features of the antecedent inflammatory disease. This was seen within 4 weeks in rabbit arthritis.(38)
Chemical synovectomy with nitrogen mustard(36) was followed by widespread necrosis not only of synovium but of superficial cartilage. In this experiment it was thought that repopulation of surface cells originated in osteoblasts at the junction of bone with synovium, although origin from deeper connective tissue did not appear to be excluded. Cellular covering with fibroblast-like cells, over and within the surface fibrin layer, antedated revascularization. Some areas that did not revascularize underwent cartilaginous metaplasia at about 6 weeks. Increased numbers of lining cells, up to three to four layers thick, were seen in some areas at 6 weeks. Occasional deep giant cells were seen.
By electron microscopy the cells invading through the surface fibrin to form the new lining were elongated and rich in rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. They showed large mitochondria, as seen in wound healing elsewhere,(57)lipid deposits, and evidence of phagocytosis of debris.
Thin extracellular filaments were seen among the surface cells at 4 weeks, and mature collagen was evident at 6 weeks. Synovial fibroblastlike cells at this stage showed dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum and increasingly conspicuous cytoplasmic microfilaments and microtubules as seen in so-called myofibroblasts typical of wound healing.(40-42) Cilia were visible only late in synovial regeneration. In some joints regenerated capillaries seen at 3 months had thick walls, while others had thin walls and fenestrations typical of normal synovium.
Thus, what appears to be normal synovium regenerates in normal animals after subtotal surgical synovectomy or more complete chemical necrosis of the superficial synovium. Evidence to date suggests that regeneration of the typical lining surface comes from deep mesenchymal cells, not from residual lining cells or circulating blood cells. All properties examined so far seem to have returned to normal, at least in most parts of the tissue. That is, collagen and mucopolysaccharides appear,(36) phagocytosis occurs in the new lining, and adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) is demonstrated as in normal synovium.(36)
The effect on the articular cartilage of temporary loss of synovium is not clear. In normal rabbits cartilage fibrillation seemed to be increased by synovectomy.(38) In animals in whom chemical synovectomy was performed, there was some direct injurious effect of the nitrogen mustard on the cartilage.
Interestingly, joints were not immobilized after any of these synovectomies in animals. What, if any, difference casting would make is not known. The administration of hydrocortisone acetate, 25 mg/week intramuscularly, was accompanied by some delay in regeneration of synovium in one study.(34)
SYNOVIAL HEALING AFTER INCISION
Wound and incision healing of the synovium has been studied only by Levene(41) in 1957 and in a recent project on eight dogs that my colleagues and I have done in our own laboratory.(46) In the latter project, sutured incisions as well as unsutured defects 1 cm' were studied in dogs who had been normal prior to surgery or in whom the cruciate ligaments had been sectioned 28 days before, leading to early osteoarthritis. Carbon black was injected intravenously to study vascular leakage.In previously normal dogs, exudates containing neutrophils, erythrocytes, and fibrin filled the sutured incisions during the first 3 days (Fig. 5-9). Carbon leaked from vessels around the incisions. By 7 days fibroblastlike cells were prominent at the base and margin; these cells covered or nearly covered the surface by 10 days (Fig. 5- 10), at which time wounds also grossly appeared healed. Some necrotic cells and fibrin were walled off more deeply. There were scattered Iymphocytes and plasma cells.
At 10 to 14 days fibroblastlike cells with large pale nuclei increased on the surface and penetrated into the deeper tissue. These cells became rounder at 21 to 28 days. Proliferation of deep round cells was seen also (Fig. 5-10, C), with some suspected Iymphocytes or monocytes adjacent to the new surface cells. There was proliferation of remaining lining cells away from the wound with 1- 4 layers of cells.
In dogs with open wounds 1 cm,(2) virtually the same sequence was seen, and healing was no slower. In dogs with osteoarthritis due to previously sectioned cruciates, some SLC proliferation was present at the time of incision or wound. Following the incision, inflammation and edema were more striking than in the previous group, and wounds actually closed slightly more rapidly.
By electron microscopy, phagocytosis of cell debris, lipid, and granular material was prominent from day 1 through day 14 (Figs. 5-11 and 5-12). Some collagen was seen to be enfolded by predominantly fibroblastlike cells (Figs. 5-13). Many cells with predominantly fibroblastic characteristics had a few dense bodies.
FIG. 5-9 Light micrograph shows mass of fibrin (F), neutrophils, and necrotic material filling an incision 1 day after surgery. (J joint space) (original magnification x 180) There were signs of activation of fibroblastlike cells containing prominent nuclei with sparse heterochromatin and nucleoli, and by the third day there were increasing amounts of dilated rough endoplastic reticulum, polyribosomes, and mitochondria (Fig. 5-13, B). At 14 days the fibroblastlike cells were clearly the predominant structure. Microtubules and microfilaments were seen but were not clearly increased. Some cells had cilia.
Many fibroblastlike cells were closely approximated to each other (Fig. 5-14) and to phagocytic cells with an occasional desmosome. From the first day on, coated pits and structures resembling hemidesmosomes were seen on a variety of mononuclear cells (Fig. 5-11). Nuclei were slightly irregular (see Fig. 5-13, A) but never extremely convoluted.
At 7 to 14 days, granular material and thin filaments (Fig. 5-14) of suspected immature collagen surrounded superficial cells. Increasing amounts of mature collagen were seen.
From day 3 on, vessels (see Fig. 5-12) adjacent to the wound had thick walls with prominent endothelial cells rich in organelles, including microfilaments and rough endoplasmic reticulum. Junctions between endothelial cells were unusually complex, endothelial processes extended into the lumen, and gaps were seen in some specimens with carbon Iying in the vessel wall. By day 7 vascular basement membranes were multilaminated. Some thrombosed vessels were seen. At day 14 there were some thin-walled suspected capillary sprouts.
From 21 to 56 days the superficial synovium showed increasingly mature collagen with fibrocytelike cells containing profuse rough endoplasmic reticulum that was no longer dilated (Fig. 5-15). There were small amounts of phagocytized debris in vacuoles. Vascular endothelium was still thick; inflammatory and purely phagocytic cells were not seen.
Few ultrastructural differences were seen between the animals with the sutured incisions and those with open wounds. The dogs with the sectioned cruciates had more thickened vessels with a greater number of gaps and more carbon leakage.
Thus, wounds in synovium healed rapidly in all dogs studied; the synovial surface was restored or nearly restored in all animals by 10 days. Inflammation was surprisingly minimal. The dogs in whom the cruciates had been sectioned prior to creation of the new wound had a somewhat more proliferative and inflammatory reaction in what appeared to be more vascular and edematous tissue. Wounds actually closed slightly more rapidly than in the normal dogs. Some residual vessel abnormalities as a result of the previous surgery or the osteoarthritis in the abnormal dogs may have contributed to these differences.
Compared with the healing of skin wounds,(40,55,57) synovial wound healing shows a similar presence of fibrin and neutrophils during the first days both in our dogs and in previous studies in rats.(47) In synovium PMNs were still visible at 3 days, whereas they had largely disappeared from skin wounds healing by primary intention.(55) In synovium, fibroblastlike cells covered the surface but left necrotic debris and fibrin deep to the surface even at 7, 10, and 14 days after suturing. This was not the case with primary skin healing, which was complete by 7 to 14 days. The synovial surface did appear healed by 10 to 14 days, which was only slightly slower than the skin healing. Levene, in his studies on synovial healing in rats, also suggested that healing was slower than in the skin but apparently found complete synovial surface integrity by 7 days.(47) In the dogs, the skin incisions, although not examined histologically, were fully healed by 7 days.
Studies to date have not shown dramatic evidence of contracting fibroblasts or myofibroblasts(41) with vast amounts of microfilaments, folded nuclei, or junctions between fibroblasts as described by Gabbiani and co-workers(40,42) in granulation tissue fibroblasts. Each of these changes was seen to a mild degree. Because some such findings are also seen in normal synovium, one may speculate that some chronic trauma occurs with joint motion, leading to some connective tissue response at all times. Normal type B SLC, although resembling fibro- blasts in many ways, seem to have more microfilaments of 80 A to 100 A (50,63) than do resting fibroblasts.(41) Occasional "attachment sites"(54) were seen among the micro-filaments in our synovial wounds; we have not observed these in normal synovium. They have been suggested to be involved in cell contraction, as in smooth muscle.(4l) The hemidesmosomes seen in our healing synovium may be important in some way in wound contraction, since they have also been found in granulation tissue.(41) Desmosomes seen in skin wounds(40) are rarely seen in synovium(63) and have not yet been seen in these dogs. Structures similar to the coated pits seen in our healing synovium have also been found as part of cell-to-cell interaction during development and inflammation(43); their role in these dogs remains to be determined. Other studies of small wounds in other tissues have not shown such contracting fibroblasts.(55) It may be that these do not occur to the same degree in relatively small wounds. We did not see any definite differences between open wounds and those that were sutured.
Wound closure is probably much more complex than can be appreciated by these plain morphologic studies. For example, the role of myosin and other intracellular proteins that are not part of the microfilaments in fibroblasts is just beginning to be studied.(71) Components of the extracellular finely granular and fibrillar material seen in our healing wounds have not been fully identified. Fibronectin, which is known to be produced by fibroblasts,(37) may be an important component along with immature collagen. Presumed serum proteins, platelets,(35) and cell debris, especially in the early stages in the interstitium, are probably factors in favoring the early migration of fibroblasts.(65) Increased contribution of these substances might explain the more rapid healing seen in the dogs with previously sectioned cruciates. It has been suggested that cell mitosis is not needed for fibroblast migration(68); in our wounds we have not identified mitoses. Levene, in his light microscopic study of rat synovial healing, did describe mitoses in fibroblasts but not in lining cells.(47)
Capillary proliferation has been well documented in wounds of other tissues. We clearly demonstrated thickening of endothelium with increased organelles, including prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum as described by others,(39) but did not identify definite pseudopods of vessels actually growing into new areas, as has been demonstrated with tumor implants. Occasional suspected capillary sprouts with incomplete endothelial linings were seen up to 21 days. Such small vessels did not have pericytes. Gaps and leakage of carbon persisted in our wounds up to 14 and probably 21 days. Proliferating vessels in other wounds have been shown to be similarly leaky.(39,59) Whether vessels remain leaky for a longer time in joints post trauma as a result of the difficulty in fully protecting the joints is not clear. Some intravenously injected carbon tracer appears to leak from normal synovial vessels(60,61) more often than from vessels in parenchymal organs. Whatever factors stimulate vascular proliferation must subside or be inhibited, since proliferation subsides as the wound heals, leaving mostly fibrous tissue at the synovial wound as elsewhere.
Our light microscopic studies and those of Levene(47) clearly suggest that the cells repopulating the synovial surface are fibroblastic in origin and seem to be migrating in from the margins. Electron microscopic findings are consistent with this, since most surface cells are rich in rough endoplasmic reticulum and seem to create a layer on the surface without prominent deep connections. Some surface cells, like those in the normal state, have varying amounts of vacuoles and evidence of phagocytosis; hence, we cannot totally exclude a monocyte origin. Study of these cells with electron microscopy, histochemistry, and monoclonal antibodies against monocytes will be needed to fully resolve the question of origin. Ross and Odland(57) have suggested that monocyte interaction with fibrocytes is important in skin wounds. In their study cells were suspected of being monocytes on the basis of routine ultrastructure. Some such close association of various cells was seen in our specimens but without desmosomes or other junctions.
Cilia were prominent in cells in healing wounds but were seen also in normal SLC.(64) Their possible roles have not been investigated. Cilia were also prominent in synovium regenerating after chemical synovectomy36 and in fibroblasts grown in tissue culture.(67,70)
SECTION THREE
THE ARTICULAR CARTILAGE
HENRY J. MANKIN
Structure
Nutrition
Chemistry
Metabolism
Enzymes
Immature Articular Cartilage and the Effects of Aging
The hyaline articular cartilages constitute a unique and extraordinary body tissue (or perhaps more appropriately, "organ") the structural, biochemical, and metabolic characteristics of which endow the mammalian diarthrodial joint with a remarkable resiliency and almost frictionless movement. Historically, the articular cartilages drew the attention of the earliest dissectors, who described their gross characteristics long before the modern era of scientific investigation. With the advent of the microscope, the histologic characteristics of cartilage were studied, and before the turn of the 20th century, investigators had described the sparse cellularity, inert appearance, and peculiar staining characteristics of the cartilage matrix. The tissue was known to be avascular and aneural and to have limited capacity for repair prior to 1920, and, because of the homogeneous staining and the effete appearance of the cells, cartilage was considered to be metabolically inert.Over the last 3 decades, technologic advances have allowed an increasing number of scientists to study the structure, chemistry, and metabolism of the articular cartilages, and a large body of information has accumulated that clearly defines not only the unique structural arrangement of the tissue and the complexity of the polydisperse matrix components but a surprisingly active set of metabolic processes.
STRUCTURE
Inspection of articular cartilage from joints of a young adult mammal shows the surface to be smooth, shiny, and dense white (Fig. 5-16). On palpation, the tissue is semisolid and elastic in the sense that it indents with pressure and is restored to its original contour upon release. The color of immature articular cartilage is somewhat bluish (presumably because of the underlying blood vessels); in aged animals the cartilage takes on a yellow cast, the nature of which is not well understood. The yellowish color is apparently not related to degenerative disease but appears to be a natural consequence of the aging process.(l50) A search for increased lipid or other pigmentary materials that could account for the yellowish coloration has led to inconclusive results.(208,287)
FIG. 5-16 Gross specimen of a young adult human distal femur and patella obtained at autopsy. The cartilage is dense white, glistening, and the surface appears smooth. The thickness of cartilage varies from joint to joint, site to site within each joint, and from species to species.(75,207,266) As a general rule, the thickness correlates well with the size of the animal, although humans appear to have thicker cartilages than many species that are considerably larger in bulk. The thickness in humans ranges from approximately 0.5 mm to over 5 mm on the patella. Cartilages are firmly fixed to the underlying subchondral bone and are very resistant to shearing stress. Although the surface of articular cartilage looks smooth grossly, histologic sections, incident light microscopy, and, more recently, scanning microscopic studies show that the contours are irregular (Fig. 5-17) (96,102,132,133,180,292) Investigators have demonstrated shallow pits and raised mounds that appear to vary with the age and species of the animal, as well as irregular undulations and furrows in certain regions of the cartilage.(131,134,135,137,2l5)
The system of lubrication of articular cartilage has been the subject of extensive study over the past 20 years. Important in the lubrication is the presence of a thin layer of proteinaceous material adherent to the surface;(239,277) this material serves as a boundary sub- stance, which when augmented by water (which is believed to "weep" from the cartilaginous surface(l82,183) contacts a similar layer of proteinaceous material on the adjacent cartilaginous surface. Thus, in circumstances of normal joint function, cartilage does not touch cartilage; rather, a boundary layer of hydrated proteinaceous molecules interfaces with a similar such material on the opposing surface.(183,278,291) The greater the axial load on the cartilage, the more water weeps from the depth of the tissue, thus theoretically increasing (but at least maintaining) the efficiency of the lubricating system, despite heavy loads. The coefficient of friction has been calculated for articular cartilage and is extremely low as compared with that for man-made machinery (at least an order of magnitude better than most ball bearing systems). (175,278,291) The presence of the boundary substance explains why there is limited attritional loss from the articular cartilage and also explains the necessity for a high concentration of unbound water (see below).
Examination of a histologic section of adult articular cartilage shows the cells to be quite sparse (Fig. 5-18),(178,271-273) and calculations of cell density show the value to be low (adult rabbits have fewer than 2 x 105 cells/mm3 of cartilage(194). The value varies from species to species, joint to joint, and site to site, but even in immature animals it rarely rises above 3 x 105 cells/ mm3.(194) The majority of the cartilage is in the form of a hyperhydrated proteinaceous matrix that provides the structural semirigidity necessary for its function as a weight-bearing and gliding surface.
Despite the appearance of random distribution, careful study of the cells of articular cartilage shows considerable heterogeneity of cell type and also of arrangement of the cells within the cartilage matrix (Fig. 5-19) (78,103,141,162,273) By custom, the cartilaginous surface is divided into four more or less distinct zones. The most superficial of these, Iying just subjacent to the surface, is called the gliding or tangential zone. Because this zone does not take a stain well, it was called the lamina splendens by early microscopists. Electron microscopic study of this region shows that it consists of a fine-fibered filamentous feltwork that presumably serves as the material to which the boundary protein adheres.(76,295) Immediately subjacent to this region is the "skin" of articular cartilage in which electron microscopic studies have shown bundles of collagen running parallel or tangential to the surface but in various planes (Fig. 5-20) (l65,181,208,227,265,269,295) The cells of the tangential zone are elongated, either spindle or oval in shape, and show small terminal processes and other characteristics suggestive of fibroblasts on electron microscopic studies (Fig. 5-21).(107,229,295) Studies of the chemical composition of the matrix in this region show this portion of the cartilage to be rich in collagen and relatively poor in the other major component, proteoglycan (see below). (204,205,295)
Beneath the tangential layer is a broader area labeled the transitional zone in which the cells are oval or rounded, quite small, and inert-appearing on light microscopy (Fig. 5-21). On hematoxylin and eosin staining the cells are thought to lie in lacunae (an artifact of this particular staining technique), and with most light microscopic techniques they shrink away from the matrix margins. Light microscopy shows the matrix to be homogeneously stained, somewhat eosinophilic with hematoxylin and eosin and bright red with safranin-O stain; there is increased concentration of the latter immediately surrounding the cells (territorial zone) and lesser staining in the regions between the cells (interterritorial zone). Electron microscopic studies of the transitional zone show that the chondrocytes have all the characteristics of cells actively engaged in protein synthesis, with a well-developed rough-surfaced endoplasmic reticulum, a well-defined Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, secretory vacuoles, and intracellular filamentous structures (Fig. 5- 22).(109,251,295) Most of the cells have a single cilium and numerous footlike processes.(272,296) Careful examination of electron micrographs shows no evidence of a true "lacuna" but instead demonstrates a region immediately surrounding the cell (the moat), which on histochemical and immunochemical studies has been shown to be very rich in water and proteoglycan and poor in collagen (91,97,133,227,273) The collagen fibers immediately around the moat region are fine and may be of a different type than the collagen in the interterritorial zones (see below). (165) The collagen fibers in the transitional zone appear to be randomly arranged, although scanning studies have suggested the possibility that they align at angles of 45¡ and 135¡ to one another (Fig. 5-23).(269) The collagen fibers vary considerably in size in this region but are approximately 60 nm in diameter and show the characteristic 64-nm periodicity. (165,208 295) Fine fibers fill the interfibrillar space and often appear to be attached to the collagen fibers. Special studies with ruthenium red and other dyes disclose that proteoglycan attaches closely to the fibers in relatively large quantities at intervals along the collagen chain (l63,263,264)
The zone immediately subjacent to the transitional zone is called the radial zone and is characterized by cells lined up in short irregular columns (approximately 5 to 7 cells per column; Fig. 5-24). The cells are smaller and appear less active than those of the transitional zone (although they have the same characteristic organellar structure, cilia, and footlike processes) and have been shown to have in association with them matrix vesicles containing calcific material. The collagen fibers between the cell columns lie in large dense bundles perpendicular to the surface of the cartilage and penetrate through to the calcified zone below.(77,139)
The calcified zone lies immediately subjacent to the radial zone and is characterized by heavy incrustation of the matrix and of the cells with hydroxyapatite salts.(139,166,150,274) Many of the cells of this region show organellar disintegration suggestive of cell death.(251,272,273,295) Studies of the viability of articular cartilage using tritiated cytidine (as a marker for ribonucleic acid [RNA] metabolism) show no incorporation in this cell layer, suggesting that the cells are in fact limited in their capacity to carry out synthetic activities.(189) The calcified zone varies in thickness from species to species and site to site, but the greatest variation is the result of age.(166) A recent study by Lane and co-workers(167) suggested that active remodeling is occurring in this region. The cartilage at the deepest portion of the calcified zone merges with the cortex of the underlying subchondral bony end-plate, which demonstrates the characteristic haversian systems of cortical bone. These systems differ from similar systems in the cortex in only one way: they are directed in the transverse plane parallel to the surface of the joint, rather than along the long axis of the bone.
A region of considerable interest to cartilage microscopists is the "tidemark," a thin, wavy, bluish line on hematoxylin and eosin staining that separates the radial from the calcified zones (Fig. 5-24) (l03,112,l26,l39) As the animal ages, frequent reduplications are noted, with as many as seven or more tidemarks seen at some sites. (139,167) No local increase in proteoglycan or other materials that might account for the bluish color (not seen with some other stains) can be discerned, and the nature of the tidemark is obscure.(139) It has been postulated by Redler and co-workers(240) that the line represents a change in direction of the collagen fibers as they pass from the radial zone to become embedded in the calcified zone. Such an alteration in structure might be protective against shearing stress, and the tidemark region may serve as a tethering site for the perpendicularly oriented collagen fibers as they become anchored in the calcified zone.
NUTRITION
When considering the structure of articular cartilage, it should be noted that there are no blood vessels, lymphatic channels, or neural elements that enter or pass through adult articular cartilage. (78) Furthermore, the chondrocytes are separated from the blood vessels of the underlying bone by a zone of dense calcification and the mature cortex of the underlying subchondral bony end-plate. Numerous studies have been performed to assess whether diffusion from the underlying bone can provide nourishment to the cartilaginous surface, and it is now well established that in the adult animal transport of nutrients by this route does not occur.(92,l93,201,203,224,275,290) Conversely, studies in which nutrients have been injected into the joint cavity have demonstrated rapid transport through the "skin" of cartilage and the matrix to the cells, suggesting strongly that the major source of nutrients for the tissue is synovial fluid. Since the synovial fluid is in itself an ultafiltrate of plasma (certain large proteins are excluded),(243) it is apparent that chondrocytes receive their nutrition through a double diffusion system. Nutrients must first diffuse across the synovial barrier into the synovial fluid and then across the matrix of articular cartilage to reach the cell. Maroudas(197,198,200) has demonstrated that the matrix of articular cartilage is not freely permeable and that diffusion of nutrients is in large measure dependent on size and charge. The data from her studies suggest that most of articular cartilage will not admit molecules larger than a hemoglobin molecule, although some recent studies have suggested that there may be "passages" for larger molecules such as albumin.(200)In light of the foregoing, it is apparent that the tissue lives in "isolation." The transport of humoral messages, such as are given to other organs by rapid transit of information peptides and proteins, may not be possible in cartilage because of the double diffusion barrier; or if transport does occur, it may be considerably slower than in other more vascular tissues. Furthermore, neural impulses that regulate many of the body processes cannot provide information to cartilage because there is no nerve supply; and all of the immune information that is transmitted either by immune globulins or Iymphocytes is likely to be excluded on the basis of the size of the messenger proteins or cell. In theory at least, the chondrocytes can receive only limited information regarding the rest of the body state by the standard neural, Iymphatic, or humoral pathways. On the other hand, if the cell is pressure sensitive (and there is some evidence to suggest that this is the case(222) it may in fact derive considerable information by alterations in the local matrix caused by loading, unloading, or movement. Since articular cartilage is the principal participant in a structure designed to move and bear load, it would seem logical that these two activities might be the means by which the cartilage receives messages to alter synthetic activity. Clearly there is considerable work to be done in this area, and a number of centers are carrying out research to establish the relationship between chondrocyte activities and alterations in the physical state of the joint.
CHEMISTRY
Considering the sparse cellularity of the articular cartilages, it is apparent that for the most part the chemistry of articular cartilages represents an analysis of the composition of the matrix. Cartilage is a hyperhydrated tissue, with values for water content ranging from 68% to almost 80% by weight (97,184,202,208,288) The remaining 20% to 30% of wet weight in tissue is mostly in the form of two macromolecular materials: collagen, which makes up approximately 60% of the dry weight; and a combination of a linear protein and polysaccharides, known as proteoglycan, which accounts for a large part of the remainder.(202,216) The ash content has been estimated at approximately 5% to 6%, and the residual is composed of trace amounts of lipid, phospholipid, Iysozyme, and an as yet uncharacterized component that is believed to be glycoprotein(216) or possibly a "matrix protein" with a molecular weight of 200,000 daltons to 300,000 daltons (Table 5-1).(231)
TABLE 5-1 Adult Articular Cartilage: Approximate Biochemical Composition The water of articular cartilage is extraordinarily important in maintaining the resiliency of the tissue and, as discussed above, also makes an important contribution to boundary lubrication. The water content remains high throughout the life of the animal, with only a modest decrease noted with very advanced age.(74,209,288) The content increases with immobilization,(121) denervation,(155) and osteoarthritis. (185) The mechanism of water binding within the cartilage is poorly understood. Since most of the extracellular matrix consists of almost equal parts of collagen and proteoglycan, it would seem appropriate that these macromolecules are somehow involved in holding the water. Although there are a number of possible ways in which collagen or proteoglycan could bind water, the most logical one, particularly in view of the free exchange of water with the synovial fluid, is complex gel formation in which both the collagen and proteoglycan participate.(83,158,169,174) The water of the gel, although unable to "flow," is believed to be freely ex-changeable with the water of fluids on the other side of the membrane (the synovial fluid) and is subject to all of the physical and chemical laws that govern osmotic solutions.(197,198,226) Experiments have shown that tritiated water administered into the knee joint of a rabbit equilibrates rapidly with the serum (within 30 minutes), suggesting a free exchange of water with the synovial fluid (Fig. 5 25).(158) In further support of the gel theory is the finding that the water can be rapidly removed by vacuum dessication, and only a small portion (perhaps 3% to 4%) is bound so tightly as to resist drastic treatment such as heating to 90 C (158)
The proteoglycans of articular cartilage are complex macromolecules consisting of a linear protein core to which are linked long-chain polysaccharide moieties (glycosaminoglycans).(228) The glycosaminoglycans are polyanionic in charge, based on the regular occurrence of carboxyl groups and sulfates along the macromolecules. (It should be noted that proteoglycans were formerly called either protein polysaccharides or chondromuco-proteins, and the glycosaminoglycans were formerly termed mucopolysaccharides). The standard model for the steric structure and chemical configuration of proteoglycans as proposed by Mathews and Lozaityte(296) is that of a "test tube brush," in which the central core of the molecule consists of a linear protein and linked to it and radiating from it at right angles are numerous glycosaminoglycan chains, stiffly extended in space. This model has been partially confirmed by elegant studies by Rosenberg and co-workers,(246) who performed ultra high power electron microscopy of mixed proteoglycan-cytochrome C monolayers.
In considering the proteoglycan molecule it would seem logical to describe each of the component parts and then to define the current concept of their molecular organization. The glycosaminoglycan molecule consists of long-chain, unbranched, repeating polydimeric sac- charides, only three of which can be found within the proteoglycan subunit: chrondroitin 4-sulfate; a stereoisomer, chondroitin 6-sulfate; and keratan sulfate (Fig. 5-26).(217,257,262) The chrondroitin sulfates are the most prevalent glycosaminoglycans in cartilage and account for 55% to 90% of the material depending principally on the age of the subject.(216) The repeating disaccharide units are N-acetyl galactosamine and glucuronic acid. The position of the sulfate on the N-acetyl galactosamine defines the isomer: when the sulfate is present on the fourth carbon the molecule is called chondroitin 4-sulfate, and when linked to the sixth, it is called chondroitin 6-sulfate. The average chain length for chondroitin sulfate in articular cartilage is 25 to 30 disaccharide repeating units(156,219,262)
The formula for keratan sulfate is not as well defined as that for the chondroitin sulfates. There are a number of species of keratan sulfate that occur in various body sites, and the exact formula and position of the sulfate remain unclear. The repeating structure for the "ideal" molecule is a galactose linked to an N-acetyl glucosamine with a sulfate on the sixth carbon (Fig. 5-26). Keratan sulfate chains in human proteoglycan are much shorter than those of chondroitin sulfate, consisting of five to ten repeating dimeric units.(84,l30,2l7,245,26l,262) The combination of the glycosaminoglycans and a protein core constitutes the proteoglycan molecule (Fig. 5-27). The protein core measures approximately 180 nm to 210 nm in length(219,245) and is rich in serine, glutamic acid, proline, and glycine.(219,245) All three glycosaminoglycans are linked to the protein at specific sites. The linkage region for the chondroitin sulfates consists of a galactosylgalactosyl-xylosyl serine chain,(153,173) while that for keratan sulfate is a neuraminyl-galactosylgalactosamine-threonine unit.(90)
Extensive chemical studies of the proteoglycan sub-unit have demonstrated that the glycosaminoglycan chains are not distributed uniformly along the entire length of the core protein (Fig. 5-27).(151,152,245) At one end (the hyaluronate-binding region) the macromolecule has few or no polysaccharide chains. Adjacent to this section is a linear segment to which are attached principally keratan sulfate moieties and a few recently described oligosaccharide chains. The remainder of the core is of variable length and has linked to it chondroitin sulfate chains and a smaller number of keratan sulfate and oligosaccharide moieties. The asymmetric nature of the proteoglycan subunit accounts for the puzzling finding by early investigators of fairly marked variation in the concentrations of the glycosaminoglycans (chondroitin 4-sulfate, chondroitin 6-sulfate, and keratan sulfate) at different ages, in different sites, and indeed in different zones of the articular cartilage. Based on studies by Roughley(249) and Sweet and co-workers,(281) it is most likely that the synthetic product is the same but that the molecules are either synthesized with different core protein lengths or perhaps partially degraded from the free terminal end to produce a macromolecule with varying numbers of the various glycosaminoglycan chains linked to it. All, however, appear to have identical hyaluronate binding-and keratan sulfate-rich regions.(82,157,248)
From data reported by Rosenberg(245,247) and others,(149,157,217,252) it seems unlikely that in normal cartilage any but a small fraction of the proteoglycan exists as the free subunit. The majority of the macromolecular material probably forms high-order aggregates containing many sub-units and having molecular weights of 60 x 106 daltons to 150 x 106 daltons.(217,234,245) These complex materials together with their gel-trapped water occupy an enormous domain, which, because of the polyanionic nature of the glycosaminoglycans, is strongly electroneg- active and evokes a resistance to compressive force that contributes significantly to the resiliency of the tissue.(217) Studies have established that hyaluronic acid (see Fig. 5-26), present in only a small quantity in articular cartilage, forms the long filamentous backbone for the aggregate (142,143,147,148) The polymer ranges from 40,000 nm to 420,000 nm in length and attached to it at regular intervals and at approximately right angles are monomeric subunits.(245) Proteoglycan subunits bind to the filament at their protein-rich terminal ends adjacent to the keratan sulfate-rich portion of the macromolecule (Fig. 5-28). Studies have demonstrated that the hyaluronic binding is a function of the protein core, and the binding is at a single site. Hyaluronate can bind as much as 250 times its weight of proteoglycan. Although hyaluronate is clearly the major factor in the aggregation of proteoglycan subunits, proteinaceous constituents known as link proteins have been found as components of the proteoglycan aggregates from every cartilage thus far examined.(219,223,255) The two proteins have molecular weights of approximately 44,000 daltons and 48,000 daltons and can now be isolated in sufficiently purified states to raise specific antibody.(236,285) How the link protein stabilizes the binding of proteoglycan subunits to the hyaluronic acid is not as yet known.
A property imparted to the cartilage by the proteoglycan is that of metachromatic staining. Dyes such as alcian blue, toluidine, azure A, crystal violet, and others serve as counterions to the polyanionic glycosaminoglycans.(237) Minute crystals of dye polymerize in a spatial relationship dictated by the loci of available sulfate and carboxyl groups, and when a critical concentration is reached, the arrangement will change the spectrum of transmitted light from the orthochromatic to the meta-chromatic color.(237,260) This phenomenon, known as meta-chromasia, is reasonably specific for the glycosaminoglycans and is of great value as a qualitative and semiquantitative indicator of the concentration and distribution of the macromolecule within the cartilage. Recently Rosenberg(244 ) reintroduced the use of safranin- O, an analine dye that interacts with chondroitin sulfate or keratan sulfate in solution. In its orthochromatic spectrum, safranin-O has an essentially one-to-one re- lationship with the negatively charged groups of the proteoglycan. Thus, this dye, which is quite stable on stained sections, is very useful in the study of cartilaginous tissue.
Well over 50% of the dry weight of adult articular cartilage consists of collagen, which for many years was thought to be similar and perhaps identical to that isolated from skin. However, compelling evidence now exists to indicate that cartilage collagen is a different genetic species. The fibers are smaller than those seen in skin and bone, are less soluble, and have an organization and structure important to the mechanical structure of the articular cartilage.
Chemically, in its simplest form (tropocollagen), collagen from cartilage measures approximately 1.5 nm in diameter and 300 nm in length. Each of these molecules consists of three polypeptide chains coiled in a rigid left-handed helical structure.(144,165) Each chain consists of about 1000 to 1050 amino acids and has a molecular weight of less than 100,000 daltons (123,212,232,233) molecular weight for the entire tropocollagen molecule is estimated to range between 270,000 daltons and 300,000 daltons.(l23,l44,232)
In terms of the molecular conformation of the tropocollagen molecule, each one of the three alpha chains consist of a major central region where the amino acid sequences are repetitions of a glycine-x-y triplet in which x is frequently proline and y is less frequently hydroxy- proline.(212,2l3) Tropocollagen molecules are ordered to form fibrils, and fibrils, by interfibrillar cross-links, are then ordered to form fibers. The fibers in articular cartilage as seen on electron microscopy may vary in width from 10 nm to 100 nm a value that may be exceeded in aging or osteoarthritis (see Fig. 5-8).(293)
The major difference between cartilage collagen (type 11 collagen) and that found in skin and bone (type I collagen) is that it consists of three identical alpha chains instead of two different chains (type I collagen consists of two alpha, and one alpha2 chains in a triple helix, while type II has three alpha, chains in the same arrangement.(94,210,214) Furthermore, the alpha l type II chains have a different chemical composition than the alpha, type I chains, with minor differences in the content of glutamic acid, alanine, and leucine(210,211,214) but major variations consisting of a fivefold increase in the concentration of hydroxylysine(210)and an almost ninefold increase in the content of hydroxylysine-linked carbohydrate.(85,270)
Considerably less information is available regarding other organic materials that are present in small amounts in cartilage. Recently, an "adhesive" protein, chondronectin, has been found in cartilage and presumably is partially responsible for maintenance of the collagen structure in relation to the chondrocyte. (154,169) Lipids form 1% or less of the wet weight of human adult articular cartilage and are found both in the cells and in the matrix. (104,136,238) Both neutral lipids and phospholipids have been described.(88,238) Their relationship to cell metabolism or matrix components is obscure.
Lysozyme, an enzyme that hydrolyzes the beta 1-4 linkage between N-acetyl muramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine, has been found to be present in many connective tissues and has been noted in high concentration in epiphyseal cartilage and, according to recent studies, in articular cartilage as well.(161,163,268) There are no known substrates present within the articular cartilage that could yield to the action of the enzyme, and its extracellular location has been somewhat of a puzzle. Recent studies by several investigators have indicated that additional proteins, as yet poorly defined, may be present in considerable concentration in cartilage.(215,217,231) Muir(216,218) has suggested that this material is a glycoprotein, but recent studies by Paulsson and co-workers(23l) support the concept that it is a "matrix protein" with a molecular weight of 200,000 daltons to 300,000 daltons.
METABOLISM
As noted above, early investigators thought articular cartilage to be metabolically inert. Over the past 25 years, however, there has been ample demonstration of a surprisingly active level of metabolism. Articular chondrocytes synthesize and assemble the matrix components and direct their distribution within the tissue. The synthetic apparatus is complex in that not only are proteins (protein core of the proteoglycan, collagen, glycoproteins, and enzymes) synthesized by the standard genetic pathway, but sugars are assembled into glycosaminoglycans, linked to the protein, and separately sulfated. All of these actions take place under avascular and at times hypoxic conditions, with considerable variation in local pressure and physical-chemical state.One of the factors that led to the general impression that articular cartilage was inert was the early demonstration that although the tissue had a well-defined glycolytic system,(179) oxygen consumption was considerably lower than in other tissues. Later reappraisals of these data, however, pointed out that the rate of oxygen consumption per unit mass was low but because of the sparse cell population the rate per cell was considerably higher and probably approached that seen in other more vascular body tissues.(95,111,164) Despite this observation, there remains little doubt that articular cartilage uses principally anaerobic glycolysis for energy product(164) have shown that lactate concentration is high in articular cartilage slices and remains unchanged despite oxygen deprivation or the addition of sodium cyanide. On the other hand, the introduction of sodium monoidoacetate causes a marked diminution in the lactic acid production. The (LDH) isoenzyme pattern for articular cartilage from rabbits, cows, and humans has been shown to contain mostly LDH4 and LDHs, isoenzymes that are thought to be facilitators of anaerobic glycolysis.(285,259) Recent studies by Lane and co-workers(164) demonstrated that deoxyribo-nucleic acid (DNA) synthesis and proteoglycan synthesis were somewhat diminished at lower oxygen tensions in articular cartilage and that these activities became optimal at 21% oxygen. It is possible that the oxygen tension is one of the control mechanisms for the metabolism of articular cartilage.
In terms of the synthesis of matrix, approximately 30 years ago investigators first noted a surprisingly rapid rate of incorporation of radioactive sulfate (35-SO4), suggesting that at least one component of the matrix was being synthesized at a rapid rate.(89,114,115) Numerous investigations have now clearly demonstrated that the matrix of articular cartilage is locally synthesized by the chondrocytes and that the rate of synthesis for at least a portion of the proteoglycan is quite rapid.(191,194,294) That for collagen is probably slower but still occurs at a measurable rate.
The process by which the chondrocyte synthesizes and assembles the macromolecules in the matrix is complicated and has at least four components, all of which have been studied extensively. These include synthesis of the protein of proteoglycan; synthesis of glycosaminoglycans and assembly on the protein core; addition of the sulfates to the fourth or sixth carbons of chondroitin sulfate and the sixth carbon of keratan sulfate; and synthesis of the collagen. All of these activities occur intracellularly and are directly (or, in the case of sugar assembly and sulfation, indirectly) controlled by the genetic system of the cell.
Protein synthesis in the articular chondrocyte adheres to the standard genetic pathway in that DNA transcribes a message to messenger RNA, which then translates the message to the ribosome for the assembly of amino acids in appropriate sequence. The protein of proteoglycan and the collagen are synthesized in this fashion.(129) Collagen is synthesized as a procollagen pre-cursor, which then must undergo additional steps for hydroxylation of proline and glycosylation of hydroxylysine.(93,110) The chain is assembled intracellularly, and the triple helix is probably organized prior to extracellular extrusion. Once in the matrix, cross-linking occurs and the terminal ends of the larger procollagen molecule are "clipped" to produce the mature tropocollagen, which is then organized into a fibrillar arrangement (Fig. 5-29). (I0l,l29,159)
Sugar assembly is unique in the tissue-synthetic processes in the sense that it does not occur at the ribosome but probably is localized to the Golgi apparatus. Assembling disaccharide units is very costly in terms of energy unless appropriate intermediaries are used;(171)in the body tissues, the customary intermediary is a uridine diphosphate (UDP)-hexose that combines with another UDP-hexose or just hexose to form a disaccharide.(99,172,262) Chain assembly occurs through combinations of UDP intermediaries(Fig. 5-30) (242,257,262)
Sulfation of sugars also occurs at the Golgi apparatus and uses another nucleotide intermediary consisting of phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate (PAPS), which donates a sulfate to the fourth or sixth carbon of the sugar.(106) The active material is generated enzymatically from adenosine triphosphate (Fig. 5-31).(230,276)
Perhaps one of the areas of greatest interest and controversy in articular cartilage is the problem of "turn-over" of proteoglycan. In 1952 Bostrom(89) demonstrated a half-life of 17 days for 35-SO4 incorporated into costal cartilage of adult rabbits, and subsequent demonstrations of short half-lives for isotopically labeled proteoglycans by Schiller and co-workers(256) and Gross and co-workers(l40) clearly indicated that the proteoglycan macromolecule once synthesized is not inert. Numerous studies have since added values, including a study performed in our laboratory in 1969 that showed a half-life of approximately 8 days for newly synthesized proteoglycan in the cartilage from the knee joint of adult rabbits (Fig. 5-32).(194) The problem with the study (and all studies of this sort) is determination of the size of the rapidly turning over pool. The best estimates range from very small (less than one tenth of 1%) to approximately 8% to 10% of the proteoglycan of the cartilage. (192,199) The fast fraction is turning over so rapidly that it suggests that there are additional fractions that are also turning over at a slower rate. Since the isotope appears on autoradiographs to disappear uniformly throughout the articular cartilage mass, there is no evidence to support the concepts of a focal loss of the cartilage surface or that cartilage is in fact being "shed" in a manner analogous to that seen in the skin. These data strongly suggest the presence of an enzymatic internal remodeling system that has as its substrate the proteoglycan and that is presumably dictated by circumstances other than a compensation for attrition. The nature of this need for rapid turnover is not clear at the present time.
The second issue raised by the rapid turnover of a small "fast fraction" is the likelihood that the proteoglycan of articular cartilage is metabolically heterogeneous and that in fact there is a wide spectrum of fractions, some of which are quite inert and others that are turning over much more rapidly. The mean figure for all of the cartilage is, as Maroudas(199) has suggested, measurable in years, but individual fractions of the heterogeneous components may turn over at much more rapid intervals.
FIG. 5-31 Scheme for sulfation of chondroitin using an adenosine phosphosulfate donor. Three enzymes are required for this step, which occurs at the Golgi apparatus.
ENZYMES
It has been known for years that certain degradative enzymes act on articular cartilage to destroy the matrix. Papain, a material extracted from the papaya plant, was noted to cause a loss of basophilia and metachromasia on histologic study, as well as profound depletion of the glycosaminoglycans on biochemical analysis.(l28,176)Fell and Thomas(128) noted that administration of vitamin A in large doses causes similar chondrolytic action. Subsequent studies suggested that vitamin A causes activation or release of potent autolytic enzymes contained within the chondrocyte but ordinarily stored in an inactive form in bodies called Iysosomes.(127,176) The enzymes were therefore known as Iysosomal enzymes.(108,109) Lysosomal bodies have been observed on electron microscopic studies of articular cartilage(251,295) (Fig. 5-33), and analyses of the tissues for Iysosomal marker enzymes such as acid phosphatase or B-glucuronidase have shown that these materials are present in very low concentrations in normal tissue but are increased by chemical maneuvers such as acidification or treatment with detergents, both of which destroy the envelope of the Iysosomal bodies.(120,284)If one considers the classes of enzymes that could actively degrade the intact proteoglycan, only two are present in the body. The first of these is hyaluronidase, which could act on the hyaluronic backbone of the proteoglycan aggregate as well as on the chondroitin sulfate chains. Although studies by Bollet and co-workers(86) have failed to demonstrate evidence for the presence of a hyaluronidase in normal articular cartilage, it is possible that one of the cathepsins may work as a hyaluronidase. The second site on the proteoglycan molecule that is susceptible to attack is the core protein, and in 1964 Ali(73) first showed evidence for the presence of a Iysosomal acid protease that could cleave the protein of the proteoglycan. Subsequent studies by a number of workers have identified these materials as cathepsin D and B, both of which are known to occur in articular cartilage and appear to be more active in specimens from osteoarthritic joints.(8l,253,291) Studies by Poole,(235) using immunofluorescent antibodies for identification of localization of enzymes in articular cartilage, have shown both intracellular and extracellular cathepsin D in cartilage, particularly in tissues that are undergoing active resorption.
Of considerable concern to investigators has been the pH at which the cathepsins act. It seems unlikely that a pH of 5. 5 or less (the optimal pH for the cathepsins) occurs in normal cartilage, suggesting the possibility that another enzyme, a neutral proteoglycanase, is operative in the tissue. Sapolsky and colleagues(254,255) and Ehrlich and co-workers(1l6-118) have independently described a Iysosomal enzyme, as yet only partially purified, that degrades the proteoglycan subunit at a neutral pH. This material may be harvested from the Iysosomal fraction of osteoarthritic articular cartilage, epiphyseal plate, or cultured chondrocytes.
Proteolysis is only one phase of the degradation of the proteoglycan, and it is likely that additional enzymes as yet unidentified act to further degrade the material. Cathepsin F has been found in cartilage, and its role is not clear.(79) Schwartz and co-workers(138,258) have demonstrated the presence of aryl sulfatase, which could serve to initiate degradation of the glycosaminoglycans.
Collagenase has been demonstrated in numerous body tissues, and the pattern of degradation has been well established.(122,145,146,179,298) Most collagenases act on collagen to cleave it into two fragments, one large and one small.(165,298) The material thus degraded is rendered more soluble and can then be further degraded by the action of the proteases.(298) To date, however, there is no direct evidence for the presence of collagenase in normal articular cartilage. Ehrlich and co-workers(119) were able to demonstrate an endogenous collagenase in osteoarthritic human articular cartilage by culture of the tissue for 7 days, followed by chromatography of the culture medium on a heparin-charged sepharose-4B affinity column activated by cyanogen bromide. It should be noted, however, that the turnover rates for collagen as have been recently described are sufficient to require some form of enzymatic degradation system for this otherwise insoluble material, and it is reasonable to suppose that the enzyme is present in normal articular cartilage but is either so tightly bound to an inhibitor(162) or present in such small quantities that separatory and assay systems are unable to detect it.(145)
IMMATURE ARTICULAR CARTILAGE AND THE EFFECTS OF AGING
Unlike many other body tissues, immature articular cartilage differs considerably from that of the adult. On gross inspection, the cartilage from an immature animal appears blue white (presumably because of the reflection of the vascular structures in the underlying immature bone) and is considerably thicker on cut section.(207) As will be discussed, however, the thickness is primarily a function of the dual nature of the cartilage mass; it serves not only as a cartilaginous articular surface for the joint but also as a microepiphyseal plate for endochondral ossification of the underlying bony nucleus of the epiphysis.On histologic examination it is apparent that the immature articular cartilage is considerably more cellular than the adult tissue, and numerous studies have corroborated the increased number of cells per unit volume or mass (Fig. 5-34),(95,190,271,273) The hypercellularity appears fairly uniform throughout the cartilage, with little variation noted in cell density. The structural organization of the tissue also differs from that described for adults in that the zonal characteristics show major variations, particularly in the lower zones. (188,225) The gliding or tangential layer remains evident in immature cartilage, although the surface cells are somewhat larger and less discoid than those seen in adult cartilage. The midzone is wider and contains a large number of randomly arranged cells. In the lower zones, however, the orientation differs markedly in that at about the half-way mark in the distance from the surface to the underlying bone, the chondrocytes are arranged in irregular columns, and at further depth the columnar arrangement becomes more evident. The cells in these columns show characteristics consistent with those of chondrocytes of the epiphyseal plate. (141) In the uppermost portion of the column the chondrocytes are round or flat or, occasionally, triangular, indicating their participation in the process of diagonal division. With further distance from the surface the cells are increased in size and demonstrate shrunken pyknotic nuclei and large intracytoplasmic vacuoles that have been shown to contain glycogen. Vascular buds from the underlying bone invade the cartilage columns, destroying the cells, and calcification is noted in the matrix between the cartilage columns in a pattern resembling the zone of provisional calcification of the epiphyseal plate.
When immature articular cartilage is examined by light microscopy, mitotic figures are readily noted and all stages of mitosis can be seen. (124,136,190) Cell replication is not present uniformly throughout the tissue, however, in that in the very young animal the mitotic activity occurs in two distinct zones, one Iying subjacent to the surface and presumably accounting for the growth of the cellular complement of the articular portion of the cartilage mass, and a second Iying deeper to this region and comprising a narrow band of cells that morphologically resemble the proliferative zone of the microepiphyseal plate of the subjacent bony nucleus (Fig. 5-34).(186-188) As the animal ages and approaches maturity, the pattern of cell replication changes. The mitotic index is diminished and mitotic activity is confined to only one zone just above the zone of vascular invasion in the lowermost portion of the cartilage, an area that now demonstrates a more diffuse calcification. No evidence for cell replication can be found in the more superficial regions.
In the adult animal mitotic activity ceases with the development of a well-defined calcified zone, a tidemark, and in some species with closure of the epiphyseal plate (1l3,187,188,190,282,283) A careful search of normal articular cartilage from adult animals of all species has failed to demonstrate mitotic figures, and studies using tritiated thymidine have not demonstrated grains over the nucleus indicating DNA replication.(113,187) Although it has been suggested that the chondrocyte divides by amitotic division, there is probably no evidence for such an activity, and cytophotometry and cytofluorometry have failed to demonstrate evidence for the nuclear polyploidy in the adult tissue.(186)
In recent years investigations have provided data regarding variation of chemistry of articular cartilage with advancing age. Water content appears to be increased in immature animals and slowly diminishes to a standard figure that remains constant throughout most of adulthood.(87,121,209,280) As the animal becomes considerably far advanced in age, there may be some diminution. The collagen content of fetal articular cartilage is considerably diminished compared with that of mature animals. (121,267) Once the level climbs to the adult values (shortly after birth), the concentration is maintained throughout the life of the animal even through senescence.
The principal variation in the chemistry of matrix of articular cartilage with advancing age appears to be in the proteoglycan molecule. Proteoglycan content in articular cartilage is highest at birth and diminishes slowly through the period of immaturity.(250) The core protein is diminished in length in immature animals, but polymerization of the glycosaminoglycan is greater. (155,156,250,251,280) As the animal approaches adolescence and maturity, the proteoglycan core becomes longer, and the chain lengths, particularly for chondroitin sulfate, diminish. While chondroitin 4-sulfate has been noted to be extraordinarily high in concentration in immature animals, a fairly rapid diminution in this value occurs with aging. Furthermore, with advancing age the total chondroitin sulfate concentration falls, and keratan sulfate increases until, at approximately age 30 in humans, the value for keratan sulfate approximates 50% of the total glycosaminoglycan and remains constant throughout old age.(50,l25,229,22l,250,280) Inerot and co-workers(157) have shown a decrease in the size of the core protein of the proteoglycan subunit with advancing age and have suggested that the loss of the chondroitin sulfate-rich terminal end of the macromolecule explains the altered glycosaminoglycan distribution seen with advancing years.
When considering the alterations of metabolic activity in articular cartilage with advancing age, it is important to remember that only the more superficial part of the immature cartilage mass is "articular" and the remainder is "epiphyseal." Despite the difficulties that this causes in assessing the roles of syntheses of the matrix, the generally accepted view is that metabolic activity and, specifically, the synthesis of proteoglycan and collagen are increased in immature animals and gradually diminish to the adult level as the animal ages. (192,193,196,213,219) The adult rate of synthesis, once established, appears to remain constant throughout the life of the animal. Surprisingly few abnormalities are noted when considering the overall effect of aging on articular cartilage. As has been indicated, the cartilage may take on a yellowish discoloration with advanced age, the nature of which is obscure. Cartilage appears to be thinner, but accurate measurements have not been carried out to support this concept. Histologically, no alterations are evident on light microscopy, but electron microscopic studies have suggested an increased number of cells showing organellar degeneration and intracytoplasmic fine filaments. Electron microscopic study of the collagen fibers shows increased fiber size in aging similar to that seen in osteoarthritis. Occasionally giant fibers are seen, particularly in the deeper layers.
The proteoglycan of aged cartilage shows some variation, however, which is probably very significant both in the development of osteoarthritis (which has a predilection for the aged) and possibly in an alteration in the transfer of water. Both Roughley and White(250) and Inerot and co-workers(157) have shown a decrease in the proteoglycan content of the cartilage with advancing age and a moderate to marked decrease in the size of the proteoglycan subunit. Keratan sulfate is increased relative to chondroitin sulfate, suggesting that the terminal portion of the proteoglycan subunit has been cleaved. Of considerable interest has been the finding that aging articular cartilage shows diminished aggregation and that there is an increase in the quantity of proteoglycan subunit as compared with aggregate. Furthermore, additional hyaluronate does not appear to enhance the aggregation, suggesting that there is an abnormality of the hyaluronate-binding region of the core protein, synthesis of hyaluronate, or a change in the character or quantity of link protein.
SECTION FOUR
THE RESPONSE OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE TO MECHANICAL INJURY
HENRY J. MANKIN
The Potential for Healing
Response to Superficial Lacerative Injury
Response to Deep Penetrating Injury
Response to Blunt Impact
Conclusions
Injuries to articular cartilage are common events in mammals, and historically probably no experiment has been repeated more frequently than surgically injuring the joint and observing the manner in which the tissues heal over time. Despite the large number of studies done over the years, some confusion remains as to the nature of the response. Much of the controversy is based on the fact that cartilage responds to different forms of trauma in different ways (see below).Before describing the response of articular cartilage to mechanical trauma, it is important to consider two issues: first, the question of whether adult articular cartilage can respond to appropriate stimuli by an increase in its synthetic activities for DNA and matrix components; and second, the "normal" course of events in the healing of body tissues after trauma and the aberrations seen in this pattern in the avascular articular cartilages.
THE POTENTIAL FOR HEALING
Central to any discussion of reparative responses on the part of the tissue is the question regarding the ability of a tissue to increase its rate of synthesis of DNA and protein. Some mammalian tissues repair with scar (e.g., skin, liver, kidney, lung, brain) while others (principally connective tissues) repair with a tissue resembling the parent tissue (e.g., bone, tendon, synovium). Regardless of the type of tissue involved in the response, the process is a cellular one in the sense that either fibroblasts (which produce the scar) or specific cells (e.g., osteoblasts, chondrocytes) must be present in large numbers at the site of injury in order to synthesize the repair tissue. For the most part fibroblasts or chondrocytes are "new" cells that must evolve by cell replication and modulation from existing cells or from cells that have migrated from the margins of the wound or from the blood vessels that are entering the tissue. It is important to recognize that DNA replication and cell division are essential characteristics of any repair process and that these processes plus those of modulation or differentiation are essential steps in the repair phenomenon.Despite the years of study of articular cartilage, there remains some controversy as to whether or not chondrocytes divide and the method by which they do so. There is little doubt that chondrocytes from immature cartilage are capable of cell division,(316,333,337) and studies have demonstrated that mitotic figures can be found in the immature animal in two zones: one subjacent to the surface, presumably for the growth of the articular cartilage mass; and the second deeper layer that forms a proliferative zone for a microepiphyseal plate for growth of the underlying bony epiphyseal nucleus.(333,336) These findings have been corroborated by tritiated thymidine autoradiographs, which show cells with grains in the two zones.(333) As the animal ages, however, evidence of DNA replication becomes more difficult to find, and in older but still immature animals, mitotic figures are rare and are located principally in the basilar areas adjacent to the developing calcified zone and tidemark.(337) The animal at this point has had a sufficient growth of the articular cartilage mass to achieve adult proportions, and one presumes that DNA replication is necessary only for remodeling of the boundary area adjacent to the underlying bony end-plate.(368) Numerous investigators have sought evidence for cell replication in the adult animal, but to date, mitotic figures have not been found in "normal" cartilage.(315,335,367) It appears that once the calcified zone is established and the tidemark well defined in the basilar areas of articular cartilage, no mitotic activity occurs. Early investigators identified chondrocytes with peculiar pyknotic nuclear formations that were thought to be evidence for the somewhat mysterious process of "amitotic division."(3ll,3l6,327,339,) Such a view is hard to dispute on histologic grounds, but tritiated thymidine autoradiographs of mature articular cartilage fail to show grains over adult cells,(333) and cytophotometric study of DNA content of nuclei has shown only limited evidence for polyploidy. These data would indicate that the chondrocyte has little potential for cell replication and raise a major question: does the adult cartilage cell "turn off the switch" for DNA synthesis or does it, like brain cells, "break the switch"? The significance of the answer is obvious. If the cell at maturity disassembles or permanently injures the DNA replicative apparatus, it would theoretically be unable to respond to any stimulus by active mitosis (including lacerative or mechanical injury). If, on the other hand, the chondrocyte only "suppresses" the replicative apparatus (presumably as a result of some cytochemical alteration), it is possible that the inhibitory system can be overcome by appropriate stimuli. The answer to the question appears to lie in the study of osteoarthritis. Analysis of cartilage from joints with osteoarthritis has demonstrated an increased number of cells in clones, and evidence for DNA synthesis has come from tritiated thymidine metabolic studies and autoradiography; and there has even been histologic demonstration of mitotic figures (324,325,343,360,369) These data suggest that under circumstances of chronic injury as is seen in osteoarthritis, chondrocytes are capable of mounting a significant reparative response and can replicate their DNA to form new cells. Whether or not the process is effective in producing sufficient new tissue to repair the cartilaginous surface is not germane to the discussion; the fact remains that the chondrocyte can divide and does so in the adult animal afflicted by osteoarthritis. The second part of the same question relates to the capacity of the synthetic apparatus for protein and glycosaminoglycan in articular chondrocytes to vary the rate at which matrix components are synthesized. The issue here is whether such activities occur at a fixed rate or whether the cell can respond to various stimuli to produce increased quantities of matrix. Ample evidence now exists that articular chondrocytes from immature and adult animals can show altered rates of proteoglycan synthesis in response to such diverse physical and pathologic states as osteoarthritis(338,339,343); altered hydrostatic pressure(359); varied oxygen tension;(303,304,330,363) alterations in pH (364) calcium concentration(352), and substrate concentrations;(3l0,33l, 362), and the presence of growth hormone(344,353,366), ascorbate(332, 363), vitamin E30s cortisol(34l,342,345) and so forth Therefore, it is reasonable to suppose that even adult articular cartilage chondrocytes, if injured, have the capacity to regain their biologically suppressed DNA synthetic activities and are also capable of substantially increasing the rate of matrix synthesis. The possibility of repair in articular cartilage exists.
The second issue that must be discussed in relation to the possible response of articular cartilage to mechanical trauma involves the pathophysiology of trauma. Since cartilage is an avascular tissue, significant modifications must occur in the normal response of the body's tissues to trauma, modifications that are likely to affect the healing process. The general response to injury in vascularized mammalian tissues is a phasic one, so similar for most organs and structures as to be almost stereotypic. The response is generally divided into three more or less distinct phases: necrosis, inflammation, and repair.
The phase of necrosis begins immediately after injury and is characterized by tissue death, which varies in extent depending on the type and degree of trauma, the dependence of local tissue on its blood supply, and the richness (and collateral circulation) of the vascular bed. Injuries of limited extent in a richly vascular tissue in which the cells are not remarkably susceptible to hypoxia may result in little or no necrosis. In circumstances in which the injury is extreme, the blood supply marginal, and the cells very susceptible to a decline in oxygen tension, an extraordinary amount of necrosis may evolve (typified by osteonecrosis of the femoral head that follows some fractures of the neck of the femur). The second phase, that of inflammation, follows almost immediately after the first and is similar to that seen in infectious or immune challenges of the tissues in that it is mediated almost entirely by the vascular system. An increase in blood flow, dilatation of the vascular channels, and increased permeability of the vessel walls produce the rapidly developing reactive engorgement and hyperemia. Transudation and cellular exudation lead eventually to the development of a large mass of cellular and proteinaceous material that fills the extracellular spaces in the traumatized area and forms a dense fibrin network, rich in inflammatory cells that have the potential for cell division and modulation to repair cells. With time, the fibrinous and cellular structure becomes organized into a primitive "glue," holding the wound edges together and sealing the wound.
The third phase of the response of tissues to trauma is that of repair, which supervenes when the fibrinous mass is invaded by newly formed blood vessels and the inflammatory cells modulate into fibroblasts to produce at first a loose vascular granulation tissue, subsequently a fibrous repair matrix, and finally scar that firmly welds the wound edges together and, by later contracting, closes the wound gap. As indicated above, in certain of the body's tissues this final phase is associated with the replacement of the damaged tissue by the same tissue as was originally injured (bone healing with bony callus; tendon healing with tendon) rather than the fibrous scar such as occurs in organs such as the skin, liver, and kidney. In these circumstances, the reparative material undergoes a sometimes prolonged remodeling process to restore or approximate normal anatomy.
In considering the application of this scheme to injuries to the hyaline articular cartilages, it is apparent that the response is likely to vary in an important way in view of the avascular state of the cartilage. Cartilage undergoes the same phase of necrosis as any other body tissues. The cells at the site of injury die, and the matrix is disrupted to varying degrees depending on the extent and type of trauma. Since chondrocytes are relatively insensitive to hypoxia, there is probably less cell death than one might see in other body tissues, such as bone. The second phase, inflammation, which is mediated almost entirely by the vascular system, is absent. No blood escapes from ruptured vessels, and no clot can be produced. There are no local blood vessels to undergo vascular dilatation, and the processes of transudation, exudation, and hematoma formation are absent. No fibrin is produced; hence, the fibrin clot that serves as the scaffolding for the ingrowth of repair tissue is absent. If one considers the third phase, repair, the absence of an inflammatory or vascular phase (necessary to bring in blood vessels and undifferentiated cells that could modulate or differentiate into either fibroblasts or chondroblasts) limits considerably the cells that are available to respond to the trauma. The burden for repair falls on the existing chondrocytes. As discussed above, they are capable of active DNA synthesis and increased matrix synthetic activity, but the task is too great for a small number of cells with limited potential for metabolic activity; as will be discussed below, experimental and clinical studies have borne out the sharp limitation of the repair potential in injuries to mature articular cartilage in which no vascular system is involved.
It should be noted, however, that if the basal layers of the cartilage are involved in the injury and, specifically, the damage extends to or through the vascular bony endplate of the underlying subchondral cortex, the previous discussion is inappropriate, since for such an injury all three phases of repair are possible. Necrosis is evidently present (both cartilage and bone), and since the bone is richly vascular, the inflammatory response can be anticipated to be very extensive. Furthermore, the underlying bone is a superb source of new blood vessels and primitive cells for differentiation and modulation to fibroblasts or chondroblasts, all of which are required for the phase of repair. Thus in deeper cartilaginous injuries (those that injure the underlying bone as well), one would anticipate a more stereotypic response in which all three phases are demonstrated and the classic form of repair occurs.
RESPONSE TO SUPERFICIAL LACERATIVE INJURY
The experiment in which a superficial (not extending to the underlying bone) laceration is produced in the articular cartilage of an animal's joint and the tissue then evaluated at regular intervals for evidence of healing has been repeated often. The earliest recorded observation was that of Hunter in 1743,(326), who stated, "from Hippocrates to the present age it is universally allowed that ulcerated cartilage is a troublesome thing and that, once destroyed, it is not repaired." Since then, numerous studies have defined the relatively meager and, indeed, ineffectual response of articular cartilage to lacerative injury (299,301,302,306,308,314,315,320,322,323,328,336,339,351.354,365) With the exception of Redfem,(357) who in 1851 made the observation that ". . . I no longer entertain the slightest doubt that wounds in articular cartilage are capable of perfect union by the formation of fibrous tissue out of the texture of the cut surfaces," all observers have demonstrated by gross, microscopic, and ultrastructural evaluation the apparent inability of the articular cartilage to produce sufficient new tissue to heal a lacerative injury or repair an ulcer on its surface. In injuries confined to the substance of the cartilage of adult animals (i.e., not violating the junction of the calcified zone and the underlying bony end-plate), the response has been shown to lack both the inflammatory and repair components of the standard process as observed in more vascular tissues. Furthermore, the reaction (or lack of it) appears to be independent of extent, depth, or orientation of the lesion and is characterized by abortive and disappointing at- tempts on the part of the cartilage to add cellular and matrix elements, which in the mature animal is almost never effective in healing the defect (Fig. 5-35).(307,314,320,340)In several animal studies the biochemical characteristics of this response have been defined. Immediately after superficial lacerative injury, ghost cells are noted in the lacunae of chondrocytes adjacent to the margin of the slice or injury (phase of necrosis; Fig. 5-36). After one day, however, a relatively intense burst of mitotic activity is noted in the adjacent cartilage (Fig. 5-37).(334) The cell replicative activity is associated with a more sustained increase, though of perhaps a lesser degree, in the rates of synthesis of matrix components as measured by 35-S04 (an indicator of glycosaminoglycan synthesis) and tritiated glycine (an indicator of protein synthesis).(314,340) The levels of isotopically labeled substrate incorporation accelerate through the second day post injury, suggesting increments in the rates of matrix synthesis and, even more important, cell replication (as measured by tritiated thymidine incorporation).(340) This process, however, is unfortunately very short lived, and by one week after trauma, the metabolic activity is reduced to levels equivalent to those of cartilage samples from sham-operated or normal joints (Fig. 5-38).(340)
Thompson(310) examined the degradative side of the metabolic response and showed increased concentrations of cathepsins, B-glucuronidase, hexuronidase, and aryl sulfatase in the first week after creation of the superficial lacerative lesions. Continued study of the tissue, however, showed a decline to control values for all enzymes. For unknown reasons aryl sulfatase became elevated again at about 16 weeks post injury. Fuller and Ghadially (370) produced tangential partial-thickness defects in the articular cartilage of rabbits and studied them both histologically and by electron microscopy. Their results did not differ from those seen in studies of perpendicular slices in that they found no evidence for repair even in young animals. Their ultrastructural studies showed cell death at the margin of the wound but also signs of an increased metabolic activity in the surviving chondrocytes, presumably directed toward the synthesis of matrix proteins. Nucleolar hypertrophy, increased quantities of rough endoplasmic reticulum, and occasional increased numbers of Golgi complexes were noted after injury, but by 6 months the defect remained and, except for some minor remodeling of the surface, all healing processes had ceased.(320) Using the same model Ghadially and co-workers(372) studied the repair tissue over a 2-year period with the scanning electron microscope. Initially a new layer of homogeneous matrixlike fibers formed over the injured surface, but as the new material slowly remodeled, the pits and depressions characteristic of the surface of normal tissue appeared, and soon thereafter all of the newly formed material was lost. At 2 years the cartilage surface was found to be almost identical in structure to the appearance immediately after injury.
Longer term follow-up of superficial lacerative injuries (slices) has demonstrated no further healing, but oddly, neither has there been evidence of progression to osteoarthritis. In 1963, Meachim(346) described a "scarification" model in the rabbit in which multiple superficial slices were made in the articular cartilage in order to produce a disorder resembling chondromalacia. He and other investigators, however, have shown that the lesions remain stable and that only occasionally does one see evidence of early osteoarthritic change. (347,370) Rosenberg performed such a study and used routine histology and safranin-O staining (as a histochemical indicator of proteoglycan concentration) to observe the cartilage over time. At the end of one year he found the lacerative defects in the cartilage essentially unchanged.
One of the more provocative theories regarding the failure of superficial lacerations to repair is related to the effect of proteoglycan on clot formation. Although the cartilage itself is avascular, it is difficult to visualize a circumstance in which a lacerative injury can occur to the cartilage without injury to the highly vascular synovium. In most injuries to a joint, the synovium is torn and blood fills the cavity. Although there is a limited Rosenberg L: Unpublished data, 1979 quantity of fibrinogen available in synovial fluid, an ample amount should enter the clot from the ruptured blood vessels, and it would seem reasonable that the clot should adhere to the irregular surfaces of the cartilaginous defect. The failure of such a phenomenon to occur is probably related to the presence of hyaluronic acid (from synovial fluid) and more directly to a leakage of proteoglycans from the cartilage matrix. This leakage coats the collagen fibers at the surface of the defect and prevents adhesion of platelets. To assess this possibility, an experiment was performed in our laboratory in which superficial lacerative defects were made in the distal femur of adult rabbits.(317) One group of animals received three intra-articular injections of very low concentrations of crude papain (a proteoglycanolytic enzyme) at 48-hour intervals. When the animals were killed at 6 weeks, there was evidence of healing of the surgically created lacerative injuries in the papain-treated joints but not in the controls. Since papain will degrade the proteoglycan and in dilute solutions would probably be most effective against the exposed surface of the wound rather than the depth of the cartilage, it is likely that treatment of the cartilage with the enzyme allows the clot to adhere and the subsequent fibroblastic repair to take place. A similar study has recently been reported by Telhag using a different enzyme treatment with perhaps even more encouraging results.
It is apparent from all of these data that lacerative injuries that remain superficial (do not penetrate below the calcified zone) evoke only a short-lived metabolic and enzymatic response that fails to provide sufficient numbers of new cells or matrix to repair even the minimal defect created by a scalpel blade. Of further interest is the evidence that has been presented that these lesions remain unchanged for at least 2 years and do not go on to either chondromalacia or an osteoarthritic type of degenerative process. This finding has some clinical relevance in that minor superficial lesions that occur as the result of trauma or surgical procedures may be considered to be of little consequence. Thus, although long-term effects of such injuries are not known, there is reason to speculate, on the basis of the studies described above, that they are generally limited in expression and do not lead to clinical osteoarthritis.
RESPONSE TO DEEP PENETRATING INJURY
Of somewhat greater interest and clinical importance is the response of the cartilage to a "deep" lesion, in which the defect crosses the tidemark to violate the underlying bony end-plate. As discussed above and reported in a number of studies, this type of injury, unlike the superficial one, causes significant damage to the vasculature of the bone and then undergoes a repair response much more characteristic of that seen in other vascularized tissues. (306-309,312,319,329,347,349,354) The deep defect, which passes through the articular cartilage to enter the underlying bone, fills immediately with blood.(307) The hematoma rapidly becomes organized into an enriched fibrin clot in which red blood cells, white cells, bone marrow elements, and platelets are trapped. White blood cells and undifferentiated cells from the marrow and endothelium modulate into primitive fibroblasts.(3l4) With the ingrowth of capillaries from the vascular bed in the base of the wound, the fibrin clot becomes a vascular fibroblastic repair tissue (Fig. 5-39).(314,334,338) With progressive fibrosis of the granulation tissue, the defect becomes filled with an initially loose fibrovascular network that gradually becomes more cellular and less vascular (Fig. 5-40, A).(303,307,359) At the base of the lesion, in the region in contact with the injured osseous tissue, bone formation is brisk and is noted to extend toward the joint. Remarkably, however, the new bone formation is sufficient to fill only the defect in the bone and usually stops at the old margin between the calcified cartilage and the bony end-plate. The defect in the cartilage remains filled with the vascular fibrous tissue, which unites the wound edges, undergoes progressive hyalinization, and subsequently becomes "chondrified" (Fig. 40, B) to produce a fibrocartilaginous mass, which at this point firmly welds the wound edges together and remains fused to the underlying new bone in the base (Fig. 5-41).(306,3l2,314) At the margins of such deep defects the surviving hyaline articular cartilage shows a brief burst of synthetic activity, which is of sufficient magnitude to replace only some of the cells and matrix destroyed by the initial wound, a response essentially identical to that seen in superficial lacerative injuries.(334) Although it has been suggested that the gliding zone of the old hyaline cartilage on either side of the defect slides tangentially to resurface the now filled-in deep injury,(306,319) the evidence for this process (which resembles that seen in skin) is scant.
The ultimate fate of the newly formed cartilaginous tissue was the subject a recent study by Mitchell and Shepard,(346) who demonstrated that early in the course of repair of such defects in rabbits the primary fibrous repair tissue was converted to a hyalinelike chondroid tissue that showed high mitotic activity and histochemical staining consistent with the presence of an increasing concentration of proteoglycan. By 12 months post injury, however, the tissue appeared more fibrous than cartilaginous and the surface layers and cells were more typical of fibrocartilage than hyaline. Of considerable importance was the failure of the tangential collagen layers (the "skin") to appear. With time the surface became fibrillated and the subjacent matrix densely collagenous (Fig. 5-42). Nevertheless, the site of the deep defect remained filled with a "cartilagelike" material that probably functioned reasonably well if the defect was not too large. This experience parallels that of others who have indicated that the site of an old "deep" laceration or defect may be clearly visible years after injury as a slightly discolored, roughened pit or linear groove on the otherwise smooth and quite normal surface of the adjacent hyaline cartilage.(30l,302,307,329,367)
To assess the importance of the size of the defect, Convery and associates in 1972 (3l7) reported on an experiment in which osteochondral defects of varying sizes were created in the distal femora of horses. The repair of these defects generally followed the process described above but was clearly dependent on the size (width) of the lesion. Defects less than 3 mm in diameter showed complete repair after 3 months and were difficult to locate after 9 months. None of the defects 9 mm in diameter or larger showed complete repair. The repair tissue for all lesions was a variable mixture of fibrous tissue, fibrocartilage, hypercellular hyalinelike cartilage, and an occasional island in which the clot served as a framework for fibroblastic proliferation, vascular invasion, and subsequent remodeling to mature scar.
In recent years several reports have described the biochemical characteristics of the cartilaginous tissue from deep coring wounds in cartilage.(308,309,32l,331) The data reported in these studies show a fairly marked variability (but usually a decrease) in hexosamine content (and in galactosamine/glucosamine ratios)(32l) but a shift from synthesis of type I collagen to type II (occurring, according to Cheung and co-workers(308,309) within 5 to 6 weeks of injury). The ultimate repair tissue closely resembles a hyaline cartilage with diminished proteoglycan but still retains an element (as high as 20%) of type I collagen, suggesting that it is a mixture of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage.(32l) The ultimate fate of this tissue is not clearly defined, but most investigators feel that over time it undergoes degenerative changes.
Another interesting facet of the problem of cartilage healing is the effect of continuous passive motion, as recently reported by Salter and co-workers.(36l) Coring defects through the underlying bone were made in the distal femora of rabbits, and the animals were treated in three ways: by plaster immobilization; cage ambulation (thus, limited activity of the joint); and by continuous passive motion (achieved by placing the rabbits in motorized assembly in which the extremities were passively flexed and extended at a slow rate). After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and the cartilage studied by histologic and histochemical techniques. In those animals subjected to continuous passive motion, the defect healed more rapidly with tissue that more closely approximated hyaline cartilage than fibrocartilage. These data suggest that continuous passive motion enhances significantly the healing of cartilage defects. An experiment reported by Baker and co-workers(390) introduced the possibility that an electrical field could enhance the repair of deep defects in the cartilage. Coring defects were created in the distal femora of rabbits, and an electrode was placed in the bone beneath the defect through a channel created in the shaft of the bone (thus not traversing the normal cartilage or the defect). In those animals in whom electrical fields were established (as compared with either controls in whom no electrodes were placed or animals in whom the electrodes were placed but not activated), accelerated healing of the defect was noted and histologic study showed hyaline cartilage filling the gap.
RESPONSE TO BLUNT IMPACT
Only a few studies have attempted to analyze the results of either single or multiple "closed" impacts on articular cartilage.(353,358) In 1970 Radin and co-workers(356) reported that strains of 20% at strain rates of 6.7 S-I destroyed bovine metacarpal cartilage. These findings are in general agreement with the more extensive studies of Repo and Finlay,(358) who impacted human cartilage obtained at autopsy by a "drop tower" technique and then analyzed the effect by radioisotopic tracer studies, histology, and scanning electron microscopy. All specimens impacted at 10% strain or less survived without apparent injury to the chondrocytes, while those impacted to strains of 40% or more showed evidence of chondrocyte death. Defects on the surface were noted in some of the more heavily impacted specimens, a finding that correlated well with failures of the collagen network as seen on scanning electron microscopy.Radin and co-workers(355) performed studies on rabbits in which cartilage and bone changes were measured after repetitive impulsive loading for 40 minutes/day for 7 days and 20 days. After one week, there was an increase in bone stiffness of 20%, and the histologic picture of the surface loss of proteoglycan was confirmed by a decline in hexosamine concentration of approximately 20%. Increased incorporation rates for both tritiated thymidine and 35-SO4 suggested that the cartilage was undergoing early osteoarthritic change. Of considerable interest, however, was the finding that when the experiment was modified to reduce the severity of the insult, the increased metabolism of the chondrocytes diminished, suggesting that the effect was transient. A similar study was performed by Dekel and Weissman,(3l3) in which the knee joint of rabbits was subjected to simultaneous shear and axial longitudinal loading. Examinations of the bone and cartilage by histology and scanning electron microscopy showed that simultaneous overuse and peak overloading (1800 revolutions under load daily for 15 days) resulted in cellular degeneration, disturbed arrangement of the cells with cluster formation, and fibrillation of the articular cartilage with penetration of subchondral capillaries into the calcified layer of the cartilage. The subchondral bone became thickened, and the changes were consistent with those seen in early osteoarthritis.
On the basis of these studies it is apparent that there is a threshold for single or multiple impacts that the cartilage can sustain without undergoing significant injury even when repeated for a prolonged period. If that threshold is exceeded, however, cartilage damage ensues and, for the most part, rapidly progresses to a lesion resembling osteoarthritis.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical implications of the observations described above should be quite apparent. A single lacerative injury to the articular surface should cause little concern. Although the lesion is unlikely to heal, the likelihood of a progression to osteoarthritis is small. Multiple lacerative injuries or even lesions resembling chondromalacia that do not violate the underlying bone can be treated by "shaving" of the articular surfaces, but unless the underlying bone is violated in the process of shaving, there is little likelihood that one will stimulate repair of the articular cartilage or that new cartilage will grow at the local site. A tangential slice of articular cartilage removed as a result of trauma or the surgeon's knife will remain as a defective area in the cartilaginous surface without evidence of repair.If cartilage defects are "drilled" so that the underlying bone is violated, one can anticipate exuberant formation of repair tissue, which in a very short period of time produces a hyaline cartilage mass to replace the damaged cartilage surface or ulcer. Unfortunately the type of cartilage produced may not be "normal," and this tissue may undergo degeneration over time. There is reason to suggest, however, on the basis of Salter's experiments, that early movement of the part following the drilling will lead to improved cartilage formation and perhaps longer preservation of the hyaline cartilage characteristics necessary for good joint function.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
REFERENCES
NORMAL ANATOMY OF SYNOVIUM
1. Barland P, Novikoff AB, Hamerman D: Electron microscopy of the human synovial membrane. J Cell Biol 14:207, 1962
2. Bierther M FW, Wegner KW, Fackeldey H: The fine structure of normal synovium in the dog as compared with the synovium after transplantation of a total knee joint. Z Rheumaforschung 31:262, 1972
3. Castor CW: Microscopical structure of normal human synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum 3: 140, 1960
4. Castor CW: The physiology of the synovial cell and its contribution to disease processes. In Holt PJL (ed): Current Topics in Connective Tissue Disease, pp 1-23. Edinburgh, Churchill-Livingstone, 1975
5. Cutlip RC, Cheville NF: Structure of synovial membrane of sheep. Am J Vet Res 34:45, 1973
6. Elmore SM, Sokoloff L: Sclerosis of synovial vessels (abstr). Arthritis Rheum 4:414, 1961
7. Gay S, Gay RE, Miller ET: The collagens of the joint. Arthritis Rheum 23:937, 1980
8. Ghadially FN, Roy S: Ultrastructure of rabbit synovial membrane. Ann Rheum Dis 25:318, 1966
9. Goglia G, Skelenska A: Richereche ultra strutturali sopra i corpuscoli di Ruffini delle capsule articolari nel coniglio. Quad Anat Prat 25:14, 1967
10. Goldi I, Wellisch M: The presence of nerves in original and regenerated synovial tissue in patients synovectomized for rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop Scand 40:143, 1969
11. Hamerman D, Rosenberg LC, Schubert M: Diarthrodial joints revisited. J Bone Joint Surg 52A: 725, 1970
12. Henderson B, Glynn LE, Litensky L et al: Evidence for cell division in synoviocytes in acutely inflamed rabbit joints. Ann Rheum Dis 40:177, 1981
13. Henrickson RC, Cohen AS: Light and electron microscopic observations of the developing chick interphalangeal joint. J Ultrastruct Res 13: 129, 1965
14. Highton TC, Myers DB, Rayns DG: The intercel- lular spaces of synovial tissue.
15. Joyce ST, Cohen AS: The interphalangeal area of Rana pipiens. J Morphol 130:315, 1970
16. Krey PR, Cohen AS: Fine structural analysis of rabbit synovial cells. Arthritis Rheum 16:324, 1973
17. Krey PR, Scheinberg MA, Cohen AS: Fine struc- tural analysis of rabbit synovial cells: Fine structure and rosette forming cells of explant and monolayer cultures. Arthritis Rheum 19: 581, 1981
18. Lever JD, Ford EHR: Histological, histochemical and electron microscopic observations on synovial membrane. Anat Rec 132:525, 1958
19. Linck G, Porte A: B cells of the synovial membrane. Cell Tissue Res 187:251, 1978
20. Linck G, Porte A: B-cells of the synovial membrane: III. Relationship with the specific collagenous structure of the intimal interstitium of the mouse. Cell Tissue Res 218:117, 1981
21. Mitnick H, Hoffstein S, Weissman G: Fate of antigen after intravenous and intra-articular injection into rabbits. Arthritis Rheum 21:918, 1978
22. Roberts ED, Ramsey FK, Switzer WP et al: Electron microscopy of porcine synovial cell layer. J Comp Pathol 79:41, 1969
23. Schumacher HR: The microvasculature of the syn- ovial membrane of the monkey: Ultrastructural studies. Arthritis Rheum 12:387, 1969
24. Schumacher HR: Fate of particulate material arriving at the synovium via the circulation: An ultrastructural study. Ann Rheum Dis 32:212, 1973
25. Schumacher HR: Ultrastructure of the synovial membrane. Ann Clin Lab Sci 5:489, 1975
26. Schumacher HR, Newton C, Halliwell REW: Synovial pathologic changes in spontaneous canine rheumatoid-like arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:412, 1980
27. Scott DL, Wainwright AC, Walton KW et al: Significance of fibronectin in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 40:142, 1981
28. Shannon SL, Graham RC: Protein uptake by synovial cells. J Histochem Cytochem 19:29, 1971
29. Simkin PA, Pizzorno JE: Transynovial exchange of small molecules in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 36:581, 1974
30. Suter ER, Majno G: Ultrastructure of the joint capsule in the rat: Presence of two kinds of capillaries. Nature 202:920, 1964
31. Traycoff RB, Pascual E, Schumacher HR: Mononuclear cells in human synovial fluid: Identification of Iymphoblasts in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 19:743, 1976
32. Wylie JC, More RH, Haust MD: The fine structure of normal guinea pig synovium. Lab Invest 13: 1254, 1964
33. Wysocki GP, Birnkhous KM: Scanning electron microscopy of synovial membranes. Arch Pathol 93:172, 1972TRAUMA AND THE HEALING PROCESS OF SYNOVIUM
34. Bentley G, Kreutner A, Ferguson AB: Synovial regeneration and articular cartilage changes after synovectomy in normal and steroid-treated rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 57B:454, 1975
35. Braunstein PW, Cuenoud HF, Joris I et al: Platelets, fibroblasts, and inflammation: Tissue reactions to platelets injected subcutaneously. Am J Pathol 99:53, 1980
36. Campbell WC, Callahan BC: Regeneration of synovium of rabbit knees after total chemical synovectomy by ingrowth of connective-tissue forming elements from adjacent bone: A light and electron microscopic study. Lab Invest 24:404, 1971
37. Carsons S, Mosesson MW, Diamond HS: Detection and quantitation of fibronectin in synovial fluid from patients with rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum 24 : 1261, 1981
38. Currey HLF, Moore CJ, Prentice AID: Surgical synovectomy and experimental immune synovitis in the rabbit knee joint. Ann Rheum Dis 29:503, 1970
39. Folkman J, Ausprunk D, Langer R: Connective tissue: Small blood vessels and capillaries. In Kelley WN et al (eds): Textbook of Rheumatology, pp 210-220. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1981
40. Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C, Huttner I: Cytoplasmic filaments and gap junctions in epithelial cells and myofibroblasts during wound healing. J Cell Biol 76:561, 1978
41. Gabbiani G, Hirschel BJ, Ryan GB et al: Granulation tissue as a contractile organ: A study of structure and function. J Exp Med 135:719, 1972
42. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G: Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia 27:549, 1971
43. Glazer I, Kol R, Lavis et al: Penetrating membrane interaction in communicative systems of cells. In Brederoo P, de Priester W (eds): Electron Micros- copy 1980, Vol 2, Biology, pp 32-33. New York, Elsevier, 1981
44. Gregg JR, Nixon JE, DiStefano V: Neutral fat in traumatized knees. Clin Orthop 132:219, 1978
45. Key JA: The reformation of synovial membrane in the knee of rabbits after synovectomy. J Bone Joint Surg 7:793, 1925
46. Lenehan T, Newton C, Schumacher HR: Incision and defect healing in synovium of normal and osteoarthritic dogs. Unpublished work.
47. Levene A: The response to injury of rat synovial membrane. J Pathol Bacterial 73:87, 1957
48. Mitchell N, Blackwell P: The electron microscopy of regenerating synovium after subtotal synovectomy in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 51A:675, 1968
49. Mitchell NS, Shepard N: The effect of synovectomy on synovium and cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop 89:125, 1972
50. Okada Y, Nakanishi I, Kajikawa K: Ultrastructure of the mouse synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum 24:835, 1981
51. Patzakis MJ, Mills DM, Bartholomew BA et al: A visual, histological and enzymatic study of regen- erating synovium in the synovectomized knee. J Bone Joint Surg 55A:287, 1973
52. Rabinowitz JL, Nixon JE, Gregg JR et al: Lipid composition of the tissues of human knee joints. Clin Orthop 143:260, 1979
53. Ranawat CS, Straub LR, Freyberg R et al: A study of regenerated synovium after synovectomy of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 14: 117, 1971
54. Rhodin JAG: Fine structure of vascular walls in mammals with special reference to smooth muscle component. Physiol Rev 24(suppl):48, 1962
55. Robbins SL, Cotran RS: Pathologic Basis of Disease, 2nd ed, pp 93 103. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1979
56. Ropes MW, Bauer W: Synovial fluid changes in joint diseases, pp 28, 77-78. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1953
57. Ross R, Odland G: Human wound repair: II. In- flammatory cells, epithelial mesenchymal interre- lations and fibrogenesis. J Cell Biol 39:152, 1968
58. Roy S, Ghadially FN, Crane WAJ: Synovial membrane in traumatic joint effusion: Ultrastructure and autoradiography with tritiated leucine. Ann Rheum Dis 25:259, 1966
59. Schoefl GIP: Growing capillaries: Their structure and permeability. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol 337:97, 1963
60. Schumacher HR: The microvasculature of the synovial membrane of the monkey: Ultrastructural studies. Arthritis Rheum 12:387, 1969
61. Schumacher HR: Distribution of carbon after in- travenous injection: Leakage into the synovium but not other non-reticuloendothelial tissues. Experien- tia28:1207, 1972
62. Schumacher HR: Traumatic joint effusion and the synovium. J Sports Med 3:108, 1975
63. Schumacher HR: Ultrastructure of the synovial membrane. Ann Clin Lab Sci 5:489, 1975
64. Schumacher HR, Kulka JP: Needle biopsy of the synovial membrane: Experience with the Parker- Pearson technic. N Engl J Med 286:416, 1972
65. Schumacher HR, Newton C, Halliwell REW: Synovial pathologic changes in spontaneous canine rheumatoid-like arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:412, 1980
66. Soren A, Rosenbauer KA, Klein W: Morphological examinations of so-called post-traumatic synovitis. Beitr Path Bd 150:11, 1973
67. Sorokin SP: Centrioles and the formation of rudi- mentary cilia by fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 15:363, 1962
68. Stewart RJ, Duley JA, Allardyce RA: The migration of fibroblasts into an in vitro wound. Br J Exp Pathol 60:582, 1979
69. Weinberger A, Schumacher HR: Experimental joint trauma: Synovial response to blunt trauma and inflammatory reaction to intraarticular injection of fat. J Rheum 8:380, 1981
70. Wheatley DN: Cilia in cell cultured fibroblasts: I. On their occurrence and relative frequencies in primary cultures and established cell lines. J Anat 105:351, 1969
71. Willingham MC, Yamada SS, Bechtel PJ et al: Ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of myosin in cultured fibroblastic cells. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 1289, 1981THE ARTICULAR CARTILAGES
72. Akeson WH, Eichelberger L, Roma M: Biochemical studies of cartilage: II. Values following denervation of an extremity. J Bone Joint Surg 40A:153, 1958
73. Ali SY: The degradation of cartilage matrix by an intercellular protease. Biochem J 93: 611, 1964
74. Amado R, Werner G, Neukom H: Water content of human articular cartilage and its determination by gas chromatography. Biochem Med 16:169, 1976
75. Armskong CG, Gardner DL: Thickness and distribution of femoral head articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 36:407, 1977
76. Balazs EA, Bloom GD, Swann DA: Fine structure and glycosaminoglycan content of the surface layer of articular cartilage. Fed Proc 25:3838, 1972
77. Balmain-Oligo N, Moscofian A, Plachot JJ: Developement epiphysaire et calcification de la couche basale du cartilage articulaire. Pathol Biol 21:611, 1973
78. Barnett CH, Davies DV, MacConnaill MA: Synovial Joints: Their Structure and Mechanics. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1961
79. Barrett AJ: The enzymatic degradation of cartilage matrix. In Burleigh RMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 189 215. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
80. Bayliss MT, Ali SY: Isolation of proteoglycans from humanarticularcartilage. BiochemJ 169:112,1978
81. Bayliss MT, Ali SY: Studies on cathepsin B in humanarticularcartilage. BiochemJ 171:149,1978
82. Bayliss MT, ALi SY: Age related changes in the composition and structure of human articular cartilage proteoglycans. Biochem J 176:683, 1978
83. Berendson HJC, Michelsen D: Hydration structure of fibrous macromolecules. Ann NY Acad Sci 125: 365, 1965
84. Bhavanadan VP, Meyer K: Studies on keratosulfates: Methylation, desulfation and acid hydrolysis studies on human rib cartilage keratosulfate. J Biol Chem 243: 1052, 1968
85. Blumenkrantz N, Prockop DJ: Variations in the glycosylation of the collagen synthesized by chick embryo cartilage: Effects of development and sev- eralhormones. BiochimBiophysActa208:416,1970
86. Bollet AJ, Bonner WM, Nance JL: The presence of hyaluronidase in various mammalian tissues. J Biol Chem 238:3522, 1963
87. Bollet AJ, Nance JL: Biochemical findings in normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilage: II. Chondroitin sulfate concentration and chain length, water and ash content. J Clin Invest, 45:1170, 1966
88. Bonner WM, Jonsson H, Malanos C et al: Changes in the lipids of human articular cartilage with age. Arthritis Rheum 18:461, 1975
89. Bostrom H: On the metabolism of the sulfate group of chondroitin sulphuric acid. J Biol Chem 196:477, 1952
90. Bray BA, Lieberman R, Meyer K: Structure of human skeletal keratan sulfate: The linkage region. J Biol Chem 242:3373, 1967
91. Brower TD: The localization of chloride in hyaline cartilage by histochemical technique. J Bone Joint Surg 38A:655, 1956
92. Brower TD, Akahoshi Y, Orlic P: Diffusion of dyes through articular cartilage in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg 44A:456, 1962
93. Butler WT, Cunningham LW: Evidence for the linkage of a disaccharide to hydroxylysine in tropo- collagen. J Biol Chem 24:3882, 1966
94. Butler WT, Finch JE Jr, Miller EJ: The covalent structure of cartilage collagen: Evidence for sequence heterogeneity of bovine a1 (II) chains. J Biol Chem 252:639, 1977
95. Bywaters ECL: The metabolism of joint tissues. J Pathol Bact 44:247, 1937
96. Cameron DA, Robinson RA: Electron microscopy of epiphyseal and articular cartilage matrix in the femur of the newborn infant. J Bone Joint Surg 40A:163, 1958
97. Campo RD, Phillips SJ: Electron microscopic vis- ualization of proteoglycans and collagen in bovine costal cartilage. Calcif Tissue Res 13:83, 1973
98. Campo RD, Tourtellootte CD: The composition of bovine cartilage and bone. Biochim Biophys Acta 141:614, 1967
99. Caputto R, Barra HS, Cumar FA: Carbohydrate metabolism. Ann Rev Biochem 36:211, 1967
100. Choi YC, Morris, GM, Lev FS et al: The effect of serum on monolayer culture of mammalian articular chondrocyte. Connect Tissue Res 7: 105, 1980
101. Church RL, Pfeifer SE, Tanzer ML: Collagen bio- synthesis and secretion of a high molecular weight collagen precursor (procollagen). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:2638, 1971
102. Clarke IC: Surface characteristics of human articular cartilage: A scanning electron microscope study. J Anat 108:23, 1971
103. Collins DH: The Pathology of Articular and Spinal Disease. London, E Arnold Company, 1949
104. Collins DH, McElligott TF: Sulfate (35S04) uptake by chondrocytes in relation to histological changes in osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 19:318, 1960
105. Crelin ES, Southwick WO: Mitosis of chondrocytes induced in the knee joint of articular cartilage of adult rabbits. Yale J Biol Med 33:243, 1964 106. D'Abramo F, Lipmann F: The formation of adenosine-3-phosphate-5-phosphosulfate in extracts of chick embryo cartilage and its conversion into chondroitin sulfate. Biochim Biophys Acta 25:211, 1957
107. Davies DV, Barnett CH, Cochrane W et al: Electron microscopy of articular cartilage in the young adult rabbit. Ann Rheum Dis 21:11, 1962
108. DeDuve C: A new group of cytoplasmic particles. In Hyaski T (ed): Subcellular Particles, pp 128- 169. New York, Ronald Press, 1959
109. DeDuve C, Wattiaux R: Functions of Iysosomes. Ann Rev Physiol 28:435, 1966
110. Dehm P, Prockop DJ: Biosynthesis of cartilage procollagen. Eur J Biochem 35: 159, 1973
111. Dickens F, Weil-Malherbe H: Metabolism of cartilage. Nature 138:125, 1936
112. Dimitrovsky E, Lane LB, Bullough PG: The characterization of the tidemark in human articular cartilage. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res, 1:115, 1978
113. Dustmann HO, Puhl W, Krempien B: Das Phanomen der Cluster in Arthroseknorpel. Arch Orthop Unfall Chir 79:321, 1974
114. Dziewiatkowski DD: Effect of age on some aspects of sulfate metabolism in the rat. J Exp Med 99:283, 1954
115. Dziewiatkowski DD: Some aspects of the metabolism of chondroitin sulfate-S3s in the rat. J Biol Chem 223:239, 1956
116. Ehrlich MG: Pattern of proteoglycan subunit degradation by human cartilage degradation enzyme at neutral pH (in press)
117. Ehrlich MG, Armstrong A, Mankin HJ: Isolation and partial purification and characterization of growth plate neutral proteoglycanase. Trans Orthop Res Soc 6: 109, 1981
118. Ehrlich MG, Mankin HJ, Davis MN: Human epiphyseal plate proteoglycanases and degradation patterns. Trans Ortho Res Soc 4:139, 1979
119. Ehrlich MG, Mankin HJ, Jones H et al: Collagenase and collagenase inhibitors in osteoarthritic and normal human cartilage. J Clin Invest 59:226, 1977
120. Ehrlich MG, Mankin HJ, Treadwell BV: Acid hydrolase activity in osteoarthritic and normal human cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 55A:1068, 1973
121. Eichelberger L, Akeson WH, Roma M: Biochemical studies of articular cartilage: I. Normal values. J Bone Joint Surg 40A:142, 1958
122. Eisen AZ, Jeffrey JJ, Gross J: Human skin collagenase: Isolation and mechanism of attack on the collagen molecule. Biochim Biophys Acta 151:637- 645, 1968
123. Elden HR: Physical properties of collagen fibers. In Hall DA (ed): International Review of Connective Tissue Research, vol 4, pp 283 348. New York, Academic Press, 1968
124. Elliott HC: Studies on articular cartilage: I. Growth mechanisms. Am J Anat 58: 127, 1936
125. Elliott RJ, Gardner, DL: Changes with age in the glycosaminoglycans of human articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 38:371, 1979
126. Fawns HT, Landells IW: Histological studies of rheumatic conditions. I. Observations on the fine structure of the matrix of normal bone and cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis, 12: 105, 1953
127. Fell HB, Dingle JT: Studies on the mode of action of excess of vitamin A Iysosomal protease and the degradation of cartilage matrix. Biochem J 87:403, 1963
128. Fell, HB, Thomas L: Comparison of the effects of papain and vitamin A on cartilage: II. The effects on organ cultures of embryonic skeletal tissue. J Exp Med 111: 719, 1960
129. Fessler LI, Morris NP, Fessler JH: Procollagen: Biological scission of amino carboxyl extension peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 72:4905, 1975
130. Gardell S, Fransson L A, Heingard D: Aging of Connective and Skeletal Tissue, pp 49FF. Stockholm, Nordiska Bakhandelns Forlag, 1969
131. Gardner DL, McGillivray DC: Living articular cartilage is not smooth: The structure of mammalian and avian joint surfaces demonstrated in vivo by immersion incident light microscopy. Ann Rheum Dis 30:3, 1971
132. Gardner DL, McGillivray DC: Surface structure of articular cartilage: Historical review. Ann Rheum Dis 30:10, 1971
133. Gardner, DL, Woodward W: Scanning electron microscopy and replica studies of articular surfaces of guinea-pig synovial joints. Ann Rheum Dis 28:379, 1969
134. Ghadially FN: Fine structure of joints. In Sokoloff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, pp 105-176. New York, Academic Press, 1978
135. Ghadially FN, Ghadially JA, Oryschak AF et al: The surface of dog articular cartilage: A scanning electron microscope study. J Anat 123:527, 1977
136. Ghadially FN, Meachim G, Collins DH: Extracellular lipids in the matrix of human articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 27:136, 1965
137. Ghadially FN, Moshurchak EM, Thomas I: Humps on young human and rabbit articular cartilage. J Anat 124:425, 1977
138. Gold EW, Gussler D, Schwartz ER: Enzymes from human articular cartilage: Isolation of arylsulfatase B and its comparison to arylsulphatase A. Connect Tissue Res 4:237, 1976
139. Green WT Jr, Martin GN, Evans ED et al: Microradiographic study of the calcified layer of articular cartilage. Arch Pathol 91:151, 1970
140. Gross J, Mathews MB, Dorfman A: Sodium chon- droitin sulphate-protein complexes of cartilage: II. Metabolism. J Biol Chem 235:2889, 1960
141. Ham AW: Histology,5th ed, p 377. London, Pitman, 1965
142. Hardingham TE, Muir H: The specific interaction of hyaluronic acid with cartilage proteoglycans. Biochim Biophys Acta 279:401, 1972 143. Hardingham TE, Muir H: Hyaluronic acid in cartilage. Biochem Soc Trans 1:282, 1973
144. Harrington WF, von Hippel PH: The structure of collagen and gelatin. Adv Protein Chem 16:1, 1961
145. Harris ED Jr: Role of collagenase in joint destruction. In Sokoloff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, vol I, pp 243-272. New York, Academic Press, 1978
146. Harris ED Jr, Krane SM: Collagenases. N Engl J Med 291:557, 605, 652, 1974
147. Hascall VC, Heinegard D: Aggregation of cartilage proteoglycans: I. The role of hyaluronic acid. J Biol Chem 249: 4232, 1974
148. Hascall VC, Heinegard D: Aggregation of cartilage proteoglycans: II. Oligosaccharide competitors of the proteoglycan-hyaluronic acid interaction. J Biol Chem 249:4242, 1974
149. Hascall VC, Sajdera SW: Physical properties and polydispersity of proteoglycans from bovine nasal cartilage. J Biol Chem 245:4920, 1970
150. Hass GM: Studies of cartilage: A morphologic and chemical analysis of aging human costal cartilage. Arch Pathol 35:275, 1943
151. Heinegard D: Hyaluronidase digestion and alkaline treatment of bovine tracheal cartilage proteoglycans: Isolation and characterization of different keratan sulfate proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 285: 193, 1972
152. Heinegard D, Hascall VC: Aggregation of proteo- glycan: III. Characteristics of the proteins isolated from trypsin digests of aggregates. J Biol Chem 249:4250, 1974
153. Helting T, Roden L: The carbohydrate-protein linkage region of chondroitin 6-sulfate. Biochim Biophys Acta 170:301, 1968
154. Hewitt AT, Kleinman HK, Pennypacker JP et al: Identification of an adhesion factor for chondrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:385, 1980
155. Hjertquist S-O, Lemperg R: Identification and concentration of the glycosaminoglycans of human articular cartilage in relation to age and osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Res 10:223, 1972
156. Hjertquist S-O, Wasteson A: The molecular weight of chondroitin sulphate from human articular cartilage: Effect of age and osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Res 10:31, 1972
157. Inerot S, Heinegard D, Andell L et al: Articular cartilage proteoglycans in aging and osteoarthritis. BiochemJ 169:143, 1978
158. Jaffe FF, Mankin HJ, Weiss C et al: Water binding in the articular cartilage of rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 56A: 1031, 1974
159. Kivirikko KI, Risteli L: Biosynthesis of collagen and its alteration in pathological states. Med Biol 54: 159, 1976
160. Kleinman HK, Hewitt AT, Murray JS et al: Cellular and metabolic specificity in the interaction of adhesion proteins with collagen and with cells. J Supra- mol Struct 11 :69, 1979
161. Kuettner KE, Eisenstein R, Sorgente N: Lysozyme in calcifying tissues. Clin Orthop 112:316, 1975
162. Kuettner KE, Harper E, Eisenstein R: Protease inhibitors in cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 20: 124, 1977
163. Kuettner KE, Sorgente N, Croxen RL et al: Lysozyme in preosseous cartilage: VII. Evidence for physiological role of Iysozyme in normal and endochondral calcification. Biochim Biophys Acta 372:335, 1974
164. Lane JM, Brighton CT, Minkowitz BT: Anaerobic and aerobic metabolism in articular cartilage. J Rheumatol 4:334, 1977
165. Lane JM, Weiss C: Current comment: Review of articular cartilage collagen research. Arthritis Rheum 18:553, 1975
166. Lane LB, Bullough PG: Age related changes in the thickness of the calcified zone and the number of tidemarks in adult human articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 62B:372, 1980
167. Lane LB, Villacin A, Bullough PG: The vascularity and remodelling of subchondral bone and calcified cartilage in adult human femoral and humeral heads. J Bone Joint Surg 59B:272, 1977
168. Laros GS, Cooper RR: Electron microscopic visualization of protein polysaccharides. Clin Orthop 84:179, 1972
169. Laurent, TC: Physicochemical characteristics of the acid glycosaminoglycans. Fed Proc 25: 1037, 1966
170. Lazarus GS, Daniels JR, Brown RS et al: Degradation of collagen by a human granulocyte colla- genolytic system. J Clin Invest 47:2622, 1968
171. Leloir LF, Cabib E: The enzymic synthesis of trehalose phosphate. J Am Chem Soc 75:5445, 1953
172. Leloir LF, Cardine CE: Biosynthesis of glycologen from uridine diphosphate glucose. J Am Clin Soc 79:6340, 1957
173.Lindahl U, Roden L: The chondroitin 4-sulfate- protein linkage. J Biol Chem 241:2113, 1966
174. Ling GN: The physical state of water in biological systems. Food Technol 22: 1254, 1968
175. Linn FC: Lubrication of animal joints: I. The arthrotrypsometer. J Bone Joint Surg 49A:1079, 1967
176. Lucy JA, Dingle JT, Fell HB: Studies on the mode of action of excess of vitamin A: II. A possible role of intracellular proteases in the degradation of cartilage matrix. Biochem J 79: 500, 1961
177. Lukens LN: Time of occurrence of disulfate linking between procollagen chains. J Biol Chem 251 :3530, 1970
178. Lund F, Telhag H: Content and synthesis of nucleic acids in the cartilage in chondromalacia patellae. Acta Orthop Scand 49:535, 1978
179. Lutwak-Mann C: Enzymes in articular cartilage. Biochem J 34: 517, 1940
180. McCall JG: Scanning electron microscopy of articular surfaces. Lancet 2: 1194, 1968
181. McCall JG: Ultrastructure of human articular cartilage. J Anat 104:586, 1969
182. McCutchen CW: Boundary lubrication by synovial fluid: Demonstration and possible osmotic explanation. Fed Proc Am Soc Expl Biol 25:1061, 1966
183. McCutchen CW: Lubrication of Joints. In Soko- loff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, vol I, pp 438-483. New York, Academic Press, 1978
184. McDevitt CA: Biochemistry of articular cartilage: Nature of proteoglycans and collagen of articular cartilage and their role in aging and in osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 32:364, 1973
185. Malemud CJ, Norby DP, Sokoloff L: Explant culture of human and rabbit articular chondrocytes. Connect Tissue, Res 6:171, 1978
186. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits: I. Growth in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 44A:682, 1962
187. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits: III. Mature articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 45A:529, 1963
188. Mankin HJ: The calcified zone (basal layers) of articular cartilage of rabbits. Anat Rec 145:73, 1963
189. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated cytidine in articular cartilage of immature and adult rabbits after intra-articular injection. Lab Invest 12:543, 1963
190. Mankin HJ: The effect of aging on articular carti- lage. Bull NY Acad Med 44:545, 1968
191. Mankin HJ: The reaction of articular cartilage to injury and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 291: 1285, 1335, 1974
192. Mankin HJ: The metabolism of articular cartilage in health and disease. In Burleigh PMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 327-353. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
193. Mankin HJ, Baron PA: The effect of aging on protein synthesis in articular cartilage of rabbits. Lab Invest 14:658, 1965
194. Mankin HJ, Lippiello L: The turnover of adult rabbit articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 51 A: 1591, 1969
195. Mankin HJ, Thrasher AZ: Water content and bind- ing in normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 57A:76, 1975
196. Mankin HJ, Thrasher AZ: The effect of age glycosaminoglycan synthesis in rabbit articular and costal cartilages. J Rheumatol 4:343, 1977
197. Maroudas A: Distribution and diffusion of solutes in articular cartilage. Biophys J 10:365, 1970
198. Maroudas A: Physiochemical properties of articular Synovium and Cartilage in Health and Disease 117 cartilage. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 131- 170. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
199. Maroudas A: Glycosaminoglycan turnover in articular cartilage. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B271:293, 1975
200. Maroudas A: Transport of solutes through cartilage: Permeability to large molecules. J Anat 122:335, 1976
201. Maroudas A: Physical chemistry of articular cartilage and the intervertebral disc. In Sokoloff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, vol 2, pp 239 291. New York, Academic Press, 1980
202. Maroudas A, Bayliss MT, Venn MF: Further studies on the composihon of human femoral head cartilages. Ann Rheum Dis 39:514, 1980
203. Maroudas A, Bullough P, Swanson SAV et al: The permeability of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 50B: 166, 1968
204. Maroudas A, Evans H, Almeida L: Cartilage of the hip joint: Topographical variation of glycosaminoglycan content in normal and fibrillated tissue. Ann Rheum Dis 32:1, 1973
205. Maroudas A, Muir H, Wingham J: The correlation of fixed negative charge with glycosaminoglycan content of human articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta 177:492, 1969
206. Mathews MB, Lozaityte I: I. Sodium chondroitin-sulfate protein complexes of cartilage: II. Molecular weight and shape. Arch Biochem Biophys 74:158, 1958
207. Meachim G: Effect of age on the thickness of adult articular cartilage at the shoulder joint. Ann Rheum Dis 30:43, 1971
208. Meachim G, Stockwell RA: The matrix. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 1-50. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
209. Miles JS, Eichelberger J: Biochemical studies of human cartilage during the aging process. J Am Geriatr Soc 12: 1, 1964
210. Miller EJ: Isolation and characterization of a collagen from chick cartilage containing three identical (x chains. Biochemistry 10:1652, 1971
211. Miller EJ: A review of biochemical studies in the genetically distinct collagens of the skeletal system. Clin Orthop 92:260, 1973
212. Miller EJ: The collagen of joints. In Sokoloff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, vol 1, pp 205-224. New York, Academic Press, 1978
213. Miller EJ, Martin GR: The collagen of bone. Clin Orthop 59: 195, 1953
214. Miller EJ, Matukas VJ: Chick cartilage collagen: A new type of aL, chain not present in bone or skin of the species. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 64:1264, 1969
215. Mow VC, Lai WM, Eisenfeld J et al: Some surface characteristics of articular cartilage: I. A scanning electron microscopic study and theoretical model for dynamic interaction of synovial fluid and artic-ular cartilage. J Biomech 7:457, 1964
216. Muir H: Biochemistry. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 100-131. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
217. Muir H: The chemistry of the ground substance of joint cartilage. In Sokoloff L (ed): The Joints and Synovial Fluid, vol 2, pp 27-94. New York, Aca- demic Press, 1980
218. Muir H, Bullough P, Maroudas A: The distribution of collagen in human articular cartilage with some of its physiological implications. J Bone Joint Surg 52B:554, 1970
219. Muir H, Hardingham TE: Structure of proteoglycans. In Whelan WJ (ed): MTP International Review of Science, Biochemistry Series One, Vol 5, Biochemistry of Carbohydrates, pp 153-222. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1975
220. Murata K, Bjelle AO: Age dependent constitution of chondroitin sulfate isomers in cartilage proteoglycans under associative conditions. J Biochem 86:371, 1979
221. Murata K, Bjelle AO: Constitutional varieties of acidic glycosaminoglycans in normal and arthritic bovine articular cartilage proteoglycans at different ages. Connect Tissue Res 7:143, 1980
222. Numata T, Deutsch S: Unpublished thesis.
223. Oegema TR, Brown M, Dziewatkowski DD: The link protein proteoglycans from Swarm rat chondrosarcoma. J Biol Chem 252:6470, 1977
224. Ogston A: On articular cartilage. J Anat Physiol 10:49, 1875
225. Ogston A: On the growth and maintenance of the articular ends of adult bones. J Anat Physiol 12:503, 1878
226. Ogston AG: When is pressure osmotic? Fed Proc 25:1112, 1966
227. Ortmann R: Use of polarized light for quanhtative determination of the adjustment of the tangential fibers in articular cartilage. Anat Embryol 148: 109, 1975
228. Pal S, Doganges PT, Schubert M: The separation of new forms of the protein-polysaccharides of bovine nasal cartilage. J Biol Chem 241:4261, 1966
229. Palfrey AJ, Davies DV: The fine structure of chondrocytes. J Anat 100:213, 1966
230. Pasternak CA: The synthesis of 3'-phosphoadeno-sine 5'-phosphosulfate by mouse tissues: Sulfate activation in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 235:438, 1960
231. Paulsson M, Heinegard D: Matrix proteins bound to associatively prepared proteoglycans from bovine cartilage. Biochem J 183:539, 1979
232. Piez KA, Eigner EA, Lewis MS: The chromatographic separation and amino acid composition of the subunits of several collagens. Biochemistry 2:58, 1963
233. Piez KA, Lewis MS, Martin GR et al: Subunits of the collagen molecule. Biochim Biophys Acta 53:596, 1961
234. Pita JC, Muller FT, Oegema TO et al: Determination of sedimentation coefficient distribution for cartilage proteoglycans. Arch Biochem Biophys 186:66, 1978
235. Poole AR: Immunocytochemical studies of the secretion of a proteolyhc enzyme, cathepsin Dl in relation to cartilage breakdown. In Burleigh PMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 357-379. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
236. Poole AR, Pidoux I, Reinier A et al: Localization of proteoglycan monomers and link protein in the matrix of bovine articular cartilage: An immuno- histochemical study. J Histochem Cytochem 28:621, 1980
237. Quintarelli G: Methods for the histochemical identification of acid mucopolysaccharides: A critical evaluation. In Quintarelli G (ed): The Chemical Physiology of Mucopolysaccharides, pp 199-215. Boston, Little, Brown & Co, 1968
238. Rabinowitz SL, Gregg JR, Nixon JE et al: Lipid composition of tissue of human knee joints. Clin Orthop 143:260, 1973
239. Radin EL, Swann PA, Weisses PA: Separation of a hyaluronate-free lubricating fraction from synovial fluid. Nature 228:377, 1970
240. Redler I, Mow VC, Zimny ML et al: The ultrastructure and biomechanical significance of the tidemark of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop 112:357, 1975
241. Repo RU, Mitchell N: Collagen synthesis in mature articular cartilage of the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg 53B:541, 1971
242. Roden L, Schwartz NB: Biosynthesis of connechve tissue proteoglycans. In Whelan WJ (ed): MTP International Review of Science, Biochemistry, Series One, Vol 5, Biocemistry of Carbohydrates, pp 95-152. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1975
243. Ropes MW, Bauer W: Synovial Fluid Changes in Joint Disease. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1953
244. Rosenberg L: Chemical bases for the histological use of safranin-O in the study of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 53A:69, 1971
245. Rosenberg L: Structure of cartilage proteoglycan. In Burleigh PMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 105 128. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
246. Rosenberg L, Hellman W, Kleinschmidt AK: Elec- tron microscopic studies of proteoglycan aggregates from bovine articular cartilage. J Biol Chem 250: 1877, 1975
247. Rosenberg L, Pal S, Beale RJ: Proteoglycans from bovine proximal humeral articular cartilage. J Biol Chem 248:3681, 1973
248. Rosenberg L, Wolfenstein-Todel C, Margolis R et al: Proteoglycans from bovine proximal humeral arhcular cartilage: Structural basis for the polydis- persity of proteoglycan subunit. J Biol Chem 251:6439, 1976
249. Roughley PJ: A comparative study of the glycosa- minoglycan peptides obtained after degradahon of cartilage proteoglycan by different proteinases and their use in the characterization of the different proteoglycans. Connect Tissue Res 6: 145, 1978
250. Roughley PJ, White RJ: Age related changes in the structure of the proteoglycan subunits from human articular cartilage. J Biol Chem 255:217, 1980
251. Roy S, Meachim G: Chondrocyte ultrastructure in adult human articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 27:544, 1968
252. Sajdera SW, Hascall VC: Protein-polysaccharide complex from bovine nasal cartilage: A comparison of low and high shear extraction procedures. J Biol Chem 244: 74, 1969
253. Sapolsky AI, Altman RD, Woessner JF Jr et al: The action of cathepsin D in human articular cartilage on proteoglycans. J Clin Invest 52:624, 1973
254. Sapolsky AI, Howell DS, Woessner JF Jr: Neutral proteinases and cathepsin D in human articular cartilage. J Clin Invest 53:1044, 1974
255. Sapolsky AI, Keiser H, Howell DS et al: Metallo- proteinases of human articular cartilage that digest cartilage proteoglycans of neutral and acid pH. J Clin Invest 58:1030, 1976
256. Schiller S, Mathews MB, Cifonelli JA et al: The metabolism of mucopolysaccharides in animals: III. Further studies on skin utilizing C'4 glucose, Cl4 acetate and S3s sodium sulfate. J Biol Chem 218: 139, 1956
257. Schubert M, Hamerman D: A Primer on Connective Tissue Biochemistry. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1968
258. Schwartz ER, Ogle R, Thompson RC: Aryl sulfatase activities in normal and pathologic human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 17:455, 1974
259. Schwartz NB, Roden L: Biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate: Solubilization and chondroitin sulfate gly- cosyltransferases and partial purification of uridine diphosphate-D-galactose: D-xylose galactosyltrans- ferase. J Biol Chem 250:5200, 1975
260. Scott JE: Afflnity, competition and specific inter- actions in the biochemistry and histochemistry of polyelectrolytes. Biochem Soc Trans 1:787, 1973
261. Seno N, Meyer K, Anderson B et al: Variations in keratosulfates. J Biol Chem 240:1005, 1965
262. SerafiniFracassini A, Smith JW: The Structure and Biochemistry of Cartilage. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1974
263. Shepard N, Mitchell N: The localization of proteo- glycan by light and microscopy using safranin-O. J Ultrastruct Res 54:451, 1976
264. Shepard N, Mitchell N: The isolation of articular cartilage proteoglycan by electron microscopy. Anat Rec 187:463, 1977
265. Silberberg R: Ultrastructure of articular cartilage in health and disease. Clin Orthop 57:233, 1968
266. Simon W: Scale effects in animal joints: I. Articular cartilage thickness and compressive stress. Arthritis Rheum 13:244, 1970
267. Simunek Z, Muir H: Changes in the protein-polysaccharides of pig articular cartilage during prenatal life, development and old age. Biochem J 126:515, 1972
268. Sorgente N, Hascall VC, Kuettner KE: Extractability of Iysozyme from bovine nasal cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta 284:441, 1972
269. Speer DP, Dahners L: The collagenous architecture 287. of articular cartilage, correlation of scanning electron microscopy and polarized light microscopy observations. Clin Orthop 139:267, 1979
270. Spiro RG: Characterization and quantitative determination of the hydroxylysine-linked carbohydrate units in several collagens. J Biol Chem 244:602, 1969
271. Stockwell RA: The interrelationship of cell density and cartilage thickness in mammalian articular cartilage. J Anat 109:411, 1971
272. Stockwell RA: Biology of Cartilage Cells. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979
273. Stockwell RA, Meachim G: The chondrocytes. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 51-99. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
274. Stougard J: The calcified cartilage and the sub- chondral bone under normal and abnormal conditions. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 82:182, 1974
275. Strangeways TSP: Observations in the nutrition of articular cartilage. Br Med J 1:661, 1920
276. Suzuki S, Strominger JL: Enzymatic sulfation of mucopolysaccharides in hen oviduct: I. Transfer of sulfate from 3'-phospho-adenosine-5'-phospho-sul- phate to mucopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 235:257, 1960
277. Swann DA, Radin EL: The molecular basis of articular lubrication: I. Purification and properties of a lubricating fraction from bovine synovial fluid. J Biol Chem 247:8069, 1972
278. Swanson SAV: Lubrication. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 247-276. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
279. Sweet MBE: Proteoglycan synthesis of chondrocytes of immature articular cartilage. S Afr J Med Sci 36:25, 1971
280. Sweet MBE, Thonar EJ, Immelman AR: Regional distribution of water and glycosaminoglycans in immature articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta 580:173, 1977
281. Sweet MB, Thonar EJ, Marsh J: Age related changes in proteoglycan structure. Arch Biochem Biophys 198:439, 1979
282. Telhag H: DNA synthesis in degenerated and normal j oint cartilage in full-grown rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 44:604, 1973
283. Telhag H, Hardrup T: Nucleic acids in articular cartilage from rabbits of different ages. Acta Orthop Scand 46: 185, 1975
284. Thompson RC, Clarke I: Acid hydrolases in slices of articular cartilage and synovium from normal and abnormal joints. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 133: 1102, 1970
285. Treadwell BV, Shader L, Towle CA et al: Purification 303. of the link proteins from bovine articular cartilage and comparison with link proteins from nasal septum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 94:159, 1980
286. Tushan FS, Rodnan GP, Altman M et al: Anaerobic glycolysis and lactate dehydrogenase LDH iso-enzymes in articular cartilage. J Lab Clin Med 73:549, 1969
287. Van der Korst JK, Sokoloff L, Miller EJ: Senescent pigmentation of cartilage and degenerative joint disease. Arch Pathol 86:40, 1968
288. Venn MF: Variation of chemical composition with age in human femoral head cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 37: 168, 1978
289. Vesell ES: Lactate dehydrogenase isozyme patterns of human platelets and bovine lens fibers. Science 150:1735, 1965
290. Virchow R: Die krankhaften Geschwulste, I, Berlin, 1863, cited by R Ekholm. Acta Anat ll(suppl): 15-2, 1-76, 1951
291. Walker PS, Dawson D, Lingfield MD et al: "Boosted lubrication" in synovial joints by fluid entrapment and enrichment. Ann Rheum Dis 27:512, 1968
292. Walker PS, Sikorski J, Dawson, D et al: Behaviour of synovial fluid on surfaces of articular cartilage: A scanning electron microscope study. Ann Rheum Dis 28: 1, 1969
293. Weiss C: Ultrastructural characteristics of osteo- arthritis. Fed Proc 32:1459, 1973
294. Weiss C, Mankin HJ, Zarins A: Autoradiographic studies of matrix synthesis in articular cartilage. Surg Forum 24:485, 1973
295. Weiss C, Rosenberg L, Helfet AJ: An ultrastructural study of normal young adult human articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 50A:663, 1968
296. Wilsman NJ, Fletcher TF: Cilia of neonatal articular chondrocytes: Incidence and morphology. Anat Res 190:871, 1978
297. Woessner JF Jr: Cartilage cathepsin D and its action on matrix components. Fed Proc 32:1485, 1973
298. Woessner JF Jr: Mammalian collagenases. Clin Orthop 96 : 310, 1973THE RESPONSE OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE TO MECHANICAL INJURY
299. Bailey RW, Habel D: The fate of surgically created osteochondral fractures in adult and young dogs. Surg Forum 11 :438, 1960
300. Baker B, Becker RO, Spadaro J: A study of the electrochemical enhancement of articular cartilage repair. Clin Orthop 102:251, 1974
301. Bennett GA, Bauer W: Further studies concerning the repair of articular cartilage in dog joints. J Bone Joint Surg 17:141, 1935
302. Bennett GA, Bauer W, Maddock ST: A study of the repair of articular cartilage and the reaction of normal joints of adult dogs to surgically created defects of articular cartilage, "joint mice" and patellar displacement. Am J Pathol 8:499, 1932
303. Bergenholtz A, Lemperg RK: Calf articular cartilage in organ culture in a chemically defined medium: I. Autoradiographic study after [35S]-sulfate labeling. In Vitro 11:286, 1975
304. Brighton CT, Lane JM, Koh JK: In vitro rabbit articular cartilage organ model: II.35-S incorporation in various oxygen tensions. Arthritis Rheum 17:245, 1974
305. Brighton CT, Shadle CA, Jiminez SA et al: Articular cartilage preservation and storage: I. Application of tissue culture techniques in the storage of viable articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 22: 1093, 1979
306. Calandruccio RA, Gilmer WS Jr: Proliferation, regeneration and repair of articular cartilage of immature animals. J Bone Joint Surg 44A:431, 1962
307. Campbell CJ: The healing of cartilage defects. Clin Orthop 64:45, 1969
308. Cheung HS, Cottrell WH, Stephenson K et aI: In vitro collagen biosynthesis in healing and normal rabbit arhcular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 60A: 1076, 1978
309. Cheung HS, Lynch KL, Johnson RP et al: In vitro synthesis tissue specific type II collagen by healing cartilage: I. Short term repair of cartilage by mature rabbits. Arthritis Rheum 23:211, 1980
310. Choi YC, Morris GM, Lev FS et al: The effect of serum on monolayer culture of mamalian articular chondrocyte. Connect Tissue Res 7:105, 1980
311. Clark ER, Clark EL: Microscopic observations on new formation of cartilage and bone in the living mammal. Am J Anat 70: 167, 1942
312. Convery FR, Akeson WK, Keown GH: The repair of large osteochondral defects in experimental study in horses. Clin Orthop 82:253, 1972
313. Dekel S, Weissman SL: Joint changes after overuse and peak overloading of rabbit knees in vivo. Acta Orthop Scand, 49:519, 1978
314. DePalma AF, McKeever CD, Subin SK: Process of repair in articular cartilage demonstrated by histology and autoradiography with tritiated thymidine. Clin Orthop 48:229, 1966
315. Dustmann HO, Puhl W, Krempien B: Das Phanomen der Cluster in Arthroseknorpel. Arch Orthop Unfall Chir 79:321, 1974
316. Elliott HC: Studies on articular cartilage: I. Growth mechanisms. Am J Anat 58:127, 1936
317. Farkas T, Lippiello L, Mitrovic D et al: Papain induced healing of superficial lacerations in articular cartilage of adult rabbits. Trans Ortho Res Soc 2:194, 1977
318. Fisher T: Some researches into the physiological principles underlying the treatment of injuries and diseases of the articulations. Lancet 1:541, 1923
319. Frost GE: Cartilage healing and regeneration. JS Afr Vet Assoc 50:181, 1979
320. Fuller JA, Ghadially FN: Ultrastructural observa- tions on surgically produced partial-thickness defects in articular cartilage. Clin Orthop 86:193, 1972
321. Furukawa T, Eyre DR, Koide S, Glimcher MJ: Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knees. J Bone Joint Surg 62A: 79, 1980
322. Ghadially FN, Thomas I, Oryschak AF et al: Long term results of superficial defects in articular cartilage: A scanning electron microscope study. Virchows Arch Cell Pathol 25:125, 1977
323. Haebler C: Experimentelle Untersuchungen uber die Regeneration des Gelenkknorpels. Beitr Z Klin Chir 134:602, 1925
324. Hirotami H, Ito T: Chondrocyte mitosis in the articular cartilage of femoral heads with various diseases. Acta Orthop Scand 46:979, 1975
325. Hulth A, Lindberg L, Telhag H: Mitosis in human osteoarthritic cartilage. Clin Orthop 84:197, 1972
326. Hutner W: Of the structure and diseases of artic- ulating cartilage. Philos Trans R Soc 42:514, 1743
327. Imerlishvili IA: Experimental study of joint cartilage regeneration. Arkh Anat Moskva 34:58, 1957
328. Ito LK: The nutrition of articular cartilage and its method of repair. Br J Surg 12:31, 1924
329. Key JA: Experimental arthritis: The changes in joints produced by creating defects in the articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 13: 725, 1931
330. Lane JM, Brighton CT, Minkowitz BT: Anaerobic and aerobic metabolism in articular cartilage. J Rheumatol 4:334, 1977
331. Lemperg RK, Bergenholtz A, Smith TWD: Calf articular cartilage in organ culture in a chemically defined medium: II. Concentrations of glycosaminoglycans and [35S]-sulfate incorporation at different oxygen tensions. In Vitro 11:291, 1975
332. Malemud CJ, Norby DP, Sokoloff L: Explant culture of human and rabbit articular chondrocytes. Connect Tissue Res 6:171, 1978
333. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits: I. Growth in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 44A:682, 1962
334. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits: II. Repair in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 44A:688, 1962
335. Mankin HJ: Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits: III. Mature articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 45A:529, 1963
336. Mankin HJ: The calcified zone (basal layers) of articular cartilage of rabbits. Anat Rec 145: 73,1963
337. Mankin HJ: The effect of aging on articular cartilage. Bull NY Acad Med 44:545, 1968
338. Mankin HJ: The reaction of articular cartilage to injury and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 291: 1285, 1335, 1974
339. Mankin HJ: The metabolism of articular cartilage in health and disease. In Burleigh PMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 327-353. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
340. Mankin HJ, Boyle CJ: The acute effects of lacerative injury on DNA and protein synthesis in articular cartilage. In Bassett CAL (ed): Cartilage Degradation and Repair, pp 185-199. Washington, DC, National Academy of Science-National Research Council, 1967
341. Mankin HJ, Conger KA: The acute effects of intra- articular hydrocorhsone on articular cartilage in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 48A: 1383, 1966
342. Mankin HJ, Conger KA: The effect of cortisol on articular cartilage of rabbits: I. Effect of a single dose of cortisol on glycine-C14 incorporation. Lab Invest 15:794, 1966
343. Mankin HJ, Dorfman H, Lippiello L et al: Biochem- ical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteoarthritic human hips: II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. J Bone Joint Surg 53A:523, 1971
344. Mankin HJ, Thrasher AZ, Weinberg EH et al: Dissociation between the effect of bovine growth hormone in arhcular cartilage and in bone of the adult dog. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:1071, 1978
345. Mankin JH, Zarins A, Jaffe WL: The effect of systemic corticosteroids on rabbit articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 15: 593, 1972
346. Meachim G: The effect of scarification on articular cartilage in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg 45B: 150, 1963
347. Meachim G, Roberts C: Repair of the joint surface from subarticular tissue in the rabbit knee. J Anat 109:317, 1971
348. Mitchell N, Shepard N: The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:230, 1976
349. Mitchell N, Shepard N: Healing of articular cartilage in intra-articular fractures in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 62A:628, 1980
350. Numata T, Deutsch S: In manuscript. 351. Paget J: Healing of cartilage. 1853. Reprinted in Clin Orthop 64:7, 1969
352. Palmoski MH, Brandt KD: Effects of calcipenia on proteoglycan metabolism and aggregation in normal articularcartilageinvitro. BiochemJ 182:399, 1979
353. Phillips LS, Herington AC, Daughaday WH: Somatomedin stimulahon of sulfate incorporation in porcine costal cartilage discs. Endocrinology 94:856, 1974
354. Puhl W, Dustmann HO, Quasdorf FU: Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zur Regeneration des Gelenkknorpels. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 74:352, 1973
355. Radin EL, Ehrlich MG, Chernack BJ et al: Effect of repetitive impulsive loading on the knee joints of rabbits. Clin Orthop 131 :288, 1978
356. Radin EL, Paul IL, Lowy M: A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 52A:44, 1970
357. Redfern P: On the healing of wounds in articular cartilages and on the removal of these structures after amputations at the joints, with remarks on the relation which exists between the diseases of cartilage and ulceration and inflammation in other textures. Monthly J Med Sci 13:201, 1851
358. Repo RU, Finlay JB: Survival of articular cartilage after controlled impact. J Bone Joint Surg 59A: 1068, 1977
359. Rosenberg L: Structure of cartilage proteoglycan. In Burleigh PMC, Poole AR (eds): Dynamics of Connective Tissue Macromolecules, pp 105-128. New York, American Elsevier, 1975
360. Rothwell AG, Bentley G: Chondrocyte multiplication in osteoarthritic articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 55:588, 1973
361. Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW et al: The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full thickness defects in articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 62A: 1232, 1980
362. Sandy JD, Brown HL, Lowther DA: Control of proteoglycan synthesis: Studies on the activation of synthesis observed during culture of articular car- tilage. Biochem J 188: 119, 1980
363. Schwartz ER, Adamy L: Effect of ascorbic acid on arylsulfate activities and sulfated proteoglycan metabolism in chondrocyte cultures. J Clin Invest 60:96, 1977
364. Schwartz ER, Kirkpatrick PR, Thompson RC: The effect of environmental pH on glycosaminoglycan metabolism by normal human chondrocytes. J Lab Clin Med 87:198, 1976
365. Shands AR Jr: The regeneration of hyaline cartilage in joints: An experimental study. Arch Surg 22: 137, 1931
366. Smith TWD, Duckworth T, Bergenholtz et al: Role of growth hormone in glycosaminoglycan synthesis by articular cartilage. Nature 253:269, 1975
367. Stockwell RA, Meachim G: The chondrocytes. In Freeman MAR (ed): Adult Articular Cartilage, pp 51-99. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1973
368. Stougard J: The calcified cartilage and the subchondral bone under normal and abnormal conditions. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 82: 182, 1974
369. Telhag H: Mitosis of chrondrocytes in experimental "osteoarthritis" in rabbits. Clin Orthop 86:224,1972
370. Thompson RC Jr: An experimental study of surface injury to articular cartilage and enzyme responses within the joint. Clin Orthop 107:239, 1975