|
Other 2004 Projects Involving |
Donaldson MT, McDonnell SM,
Schanbacher BJ et al
|
|
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variation in plasma ACTH
concentration and dexamethasone suppression test (DST) results
associated with season, age and sex in healthy, Shetland pony mares (n =
15) and pony stallions (n = 14) living under semi-feral conditions and
horse mares (n = 10) living at pasture. Plasma ACTH concentrations were
measured in September 2002, and in January, May and September 2003.
Dexamethasone suppression tests were performed in January and September
2003. Plasma ACTH concentrations in September 2002 and September 2003
were similar and were significantly greater than in January and May (P
< .001). Plasma ACTH concentration was within the reference range for 38
of 39 (97%) subjects in January, for 39 of 39 (100%) subjects in May,
for 2 of 39 (5%) subjects in September 2002, and for 3 of 39 (8%)
subjects in September 2003. Dexamethasone suppression tests were within
the reference range in all subjects in January and were within the
reference range for 29 of 39 (74%) subjects in September 2003. Plasma
cortisol concentration at the end of the DST was significantly greater
in September than January (P = .002). Age was positively
correlated with plasma ACTH and plasma cortisol concentration at the
beginning and end of the DST. Within the same season, plasma ACTH
concentration in pony mares, pony stallions and horse mares was not
significantly different (P > 0.05). Seasonal changes in plasma
ACTH concentration and DST results should be considered when
interpreting endocrine test results. Accepted for publication in J Vet Intern Med 2004.
|
Seasonal and sample handling effects on measurement
of plasma alpha-
|
McFarlane D, Donaldson MT, McDonnell
SM, Cribb AE. |
|
Objective:
To investigate the effects of sample handling, storage and collection
time and season on a-melanocyte stimulating hormone (a-MSH)
concentration in healthy horses and ponies
|
Injuries and blemishes in a semi-feral herd of ponies
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elkanah H Grogan BS and Sue M McDonnell PhD
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With the goal of characterizing the type and degree of injuries and blemishes incurred by horses living under natural social conditions, all members of a semi-feral herd of ponies were inspected on four occasions over a period of 28 months. Two occasions were during breeding/foaling season and two during non-breeding/foaling season months. On each occasion, each animal was examined (n= 47 to 65) and all injuries or blemish marks were recorded. Based on the types and number of injuries or blemishes, an Injury/Blemish Grade was assigned for each inspection, ranging from 1 for no blemishes to 6 for more than one open wound. Almost all injuries and blemishes recorded were extremely mild. Only 12 of the 213 inspections and 14 of the 838 total injuries and blemishes involved wounds affecting tissues other than hair and skin.
Males had significantly greater mean Injury/Blemish Grade than females (p<0.0001). For all social categories and ages, the mean Injury/Blemish Grade was significantly greater in the breeding/foaling season months than during the non-breeding/foaling season (p<0.0001).
All foals were blemish-free at the non-breeding\foaling season inspections (n=24) and relatively blemish-free (9 of 14) at the breeding/foaling season inspections.
The rump and the barrel areas were the most common site of injuries or blemishes, both as a percentage of the total injury count as well as a percentage of inspections involving those areas. These findings are consistent with the seasonal and gender patterns of aggressive behavior observed in this herd. Compared to reports of truly feral horse populations, it appears that injuries are fewer and less severe in this semi-feral herd. In addition, there appears to be fewer leg injuries in this semi-feral herd than has been described for truly feral horse populations. Injuries and blemishes by body area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a Dorothy Russell Havemeyer Foundation project.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of intranasal treatment on behavior of horses
and ponies
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elkanah H Grogan BS and Sue M
McDonnell PhD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intranasal application of medications is becoming more common in veterinary medicine. For the horse, intranasal treatments available in recent years include vaccination against Streptococcus equi, equine influenza, and equine rhinopneumonitis-influenza. To evaluate anecdotally reported behavioral resistance to intranasal treatment and the development of head shyness and behavioral aversions as a result of intranasal treatments in horses, horses and ponies were exposed to intranasal treatments using Heska or Fort Dodge type intranasal applicators (marketed at the time of this study) or control procedure. Our objective was to evaluate behavioral compliance of horses to intranasal treatment itself, and to assess development of aversion to veterinary examination as a result of experience with intranasal applicators. Subjects included 37 horses and ponies including 28 light horse mares, 4 pony geldings, and 5 light horse and pony stallions. Compliance with the procedure itself, as well as with a standard physical examination pre- and post-treatment, was measured. For 22 horses receiving intranasal treatment, no problematic avoidance behavior was elicited during the intranasal treatment, and no effect on duration of or compliance with a standard physical examination including manipulation of the head, nose, and mouth was detected. Results were similar for Heska and Fort Dodge applicators, both for the treatment procedure and for compliance with the physical examination. For 3 of the 6 ponies receiving intranasal treatment, significant avoidance behavior was observed, as well as apparent adverse effects on compliance in post-treatment physical examination. Comparison of results of a subset of subjects treated with warm (n=6) and cold (n=6) applicators and contents during cold wither months suggest no difference in compliance due to this factor. Of the 6 ponies receiving intranasal treatments, 3 exhibited significant avoidance behavior during the treatment itself, as well as mildly to moderately increased aversion to subsequent physical examination of the ears, nose, and mouth, but not to hand sweep of the body and auscultation, wiping of the eyes, or jugular stick. The technician, who treated both the horses and the ponies in this work, attributed the ponies’ greater resistance to intranasal treatment to greater likelihood of contact of the applicator with the considerably narrower and shorter nasal passage. While there is potential for problems with behavioral compliance with intranasal treatments and subsequent aversion to physical examination as seen here in some ponies, no problems were seen in the 22 treated horses compared to controls. Further work is needed to understand factors involved in practitioner reports of aversions developing in association with intranasal vaccination procedures. This is a Dorothy Russell Havemeyer Foundation project. Fort Dodge and Heska kindly provided intranasal applicators. Dr. Patricia Sertich facilitated use of horses in this study. Dr. Rob Holland of Intervet offered suggestions on possible causes of behavioral resistance.
|